From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB55C2BB84 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 06:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100BE21548 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 06:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="dn2D9TiX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726722AbgIGGLh (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 02:11:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51022 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725803AbgIGGLg (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 02:11:36 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A520BC061573; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 23:11:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=qfcALgvFzZYc/TWT3h5fMbHKeWOPoZL7AoIZsE93hQo=; b=dn2D9TiXe1LDIDlV1gQsXwiTjX 5dA9T1ojQpMSM5eJyXJPC+XIleTHAJp2xN8n4Vmxa+uPtaPXMLjwBNVaQlEc4JXjJ+AZXOTbktX1Q HEYagLu5mM5tpQz68LbkspH8Rl/+4maOP1z4/Q7lR2Trde+6AdiJJSb84ctKey68868Mi7iBdCdG8 XSFe2xxB4SkRrx/qlOl1BPytAIMjYsImzjZ55XT9n4Q7Qw02TGYmMZNolsHpaXTDKr7iwPT1zlo1B FGHOTlcrCQzMIopOcac4bS0lxYWGpeF4jxoWAdkIomOlLbKDeQbqw7VDbXSRnT7qSTKTzADqQfwTq Sfv0OQoQ==; Received: from hch by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kFANC-0003wC-UU; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 06:11:26 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 07:11:26 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Yash Shah Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, bp@alien8.de, mchehab@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sachin.ghadi@sifive.com, rrichter@marvell.com, james.morse@arm.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: sifive: Add SiFive specific Cadence DDR controller driver Message-ID: <20200907061126.GA14999@infradead.org> References: <1599457679-8947-1-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com> <1599457679-8947-3-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1599457679-8947-3-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:17:58AM +0530, Yash Shah wrote: > Add a driver to manage the Cadence DDR controller present on SiFive SoCs > At present the driver manages the EDAC feature of the DDR controller. > Additional features may be added to the driver in future to control > other aspects of the DDR controller. So if this is a generic(ish) Cadence IP block shouldn't it be named Cadence and made generic? Or is the frontend somehow SiFive specific?