From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A1EC433E2 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2876221D90 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731322AbgIJPio (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:38:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38328 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731372AbgIJPhg (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:37:36 -0400 Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA99C061367; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kGOLE-00Dnc6-N4; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:18:28 +0000 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:18:28 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Rich Felker Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: add fchmodat2 syscall Message-ID: <20200910151828.GD1236603@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20200910142335.GG3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200910142335.GG3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:23:37AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > It was determined (see glibc issue #14578 and commit a492b1e5ef) that, > on some filesystems, performing chmod on the link itself produces a > change in the inode's access mode, but returns an EOPNOTSUPP error. Which filesystem types are those?