From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] get rid of the remaining kernel-doc warnings when building the docs
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:12:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200910181208.GW6583@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1599732764.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:23:53PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> As described on its subject, this series finally get rid of all kernel-doc warnings.
>
> With this series applied (plus my last series fixing other warnings), building
> the docs is now clean[1] against next-20200909:
Thanks, this has been a truly heroic effort.
I'd suggest that we change the kernel build to always run the CHKDOC
instead of at W=1 (or rather, as the patch I just sent out demonstrates,
not at all (oops)). Otherwise you're just going to have to continue
doing this.
At some point, perhaps we can add some other warnings at W=1, like
an EXPORT_SYMBOL of a function which doesn't have kernel-doc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-10 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 10:23 [PATCH 00/14] get rid of the remaining kernel-doc warnings when building the docs Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:23 ` [PATCH 01/14] locking/refcount: document the new "oldp" pointer value Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:23 ` [PATCH 02/14] usb: docs: document altmode register/unregister functions Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:23 ` [PATCH 03/14] XArray: docs: add missing kernel-doc parameters for xas_split_alloc() Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 11:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-10 12:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:23 ` [PATCH 04/14] blk-mq: docs: add kernel-doc description for a new struct member Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:23 ` [PATCH 05/14] iio: docs: add description for a new function member Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:23 ` [PATCH 06/14] nl80211: docs: add a description for s1g_cap parameter Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:24 ` [PATCH 07/14] IB/srpt: docs: add a description for cq_size member Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:24 ` [PATCH 08/14] rcu/tree: docs: document bkvcache new members at struct kfree_rcu_cpu Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:24 ` [PATCH 09/14] Input: sparse-keymap: add a description for @sw Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:24 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm: amdgpu: kernel-doc: update some adev parameters Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:24 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/amd/display: kernel-doc: document force_timing_sync Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:24 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm: kernel-doc: document drm_dp_set_subconnector_property() params Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:24 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm: kernel-doc: drm_dp_helper.h: fix a typo Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 10:24 ` [PATCH 14/14] gpu: docs: amdgpu.rst: get rid of wrong kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-09-10 18:12 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-10-05 10:51 ` [PATCH 00/14] get rid of the remaining kernel-doc warnings when building the docs Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-10-05 10:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-10-06 11:53 ` [PATCH RFC] script: add a script for checking doc problems with external functions Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-10-06 12:13 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-10-07 8:23 ` Jani Nikula
2020-10-07 8:32 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-07 13:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200910181208.GW6583@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).