linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/8] kernel/resource: make release_mem_region_adjustable() never fail
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:34:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200911103459.10306-2-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200911103459.10306-1-david@redhat.com>

Let's make sure splitting a resource on memory hotunplug will never fail.
This will become more relevant once we merge selected System RAM
resources - then, we'll trigger that case more often on memory hotunplug.

In general, this function is already unlikely to fail. When we remove
memory, we free up quite a lot of metadata (memmap, page tables, memory
block device, etc.). The only reason it could really fail would be when
injecting allocation errors.

All other error cases inside release_mem_region_adjustable() seem to be
sanity checks if the function would be abused in different context -
let's add WARN_ON_ONCE() in these cases so we can catch them.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/ioport.h |  4 ++--
 kernel/resource.c      | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 mm/memory_hotplug.c    | 22 +------------------
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
index 6c2b06fe8beb7..52a91f5fa1a36 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioport.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
@@ -248,8 +248,8 @@ extern struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *,
 extern void __release_region(struct resource *, resource_size_t,
 				resource_size_t);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
-extern int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *, resource_size_t,
-				resource_size_t);
+extern void release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *, resource_size_t,
+					  resource_size_t);
 #endif
 
 /* Wrappers for managed devices */
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index f1175ce93a1d5..36b3552210120 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -1258,21 +1258,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__release_region);
  *   assumes that all children remain in the lower address entry for
  *   simplicity.  Enhance this logic when necessary.
  */
-int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
-				  resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size)
+void release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
+				   resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size)
 {
+	struct resource *new_res = NULL;
+	bool alloc_nofail = false;
 	struct resource **p;
 	struct resource *res;
-	struct resource *new_res;
 	resource_size_t end;
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
 	end = start + size - 1;
-	if ((start < parent->start) || (end > parent->end))
-		return ret;
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE((start < parent->start) || (end > parent->end)))
+		return;
 
-	/* The alloc_resource() result gets checked later */
-	new_res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL);
+	/*
+	 * We free up quite a lot of memory on memory hotunplug (esp., memap),
+	 * just before releasing the region. This is highly unlikely to
+	 * fail - let's play save and make it never fail as the caller cannot
+	 * perform any error handling (e.g., trying to re-add memory will fail
+	 * similarly).
+	 */
+retry:
+	new_res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL | alloc_nofail ? __GFP_NOFAIL : 0);
 
 	p = &parent->child;
 	write_lock(&resource_lock);
@@ -1298,7 +1305,6 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
 		 * so if we are dealing with them, let us just back off here.
 		 */
 		if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_SYSRAM)) {
-			ret = 0;
 			break;
 		}
 
@@ -1315,20 +1321,23 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
 			/* free the whole entry */
 			*p = res->sibling;
 			free_resource(res);
-			ret = 0;
 		} else if (res->start == start && res->end != end) {
 			/* adjust the start */
-			ret = __adjust_resource(res, end + 1,
-						res->end - end);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(__adjust_resource(res, end + 1,
+						       res->end - end));
 		} else if (res->start != start && res->end == end) {
 			/* adjust the end */
-			ret = __adjust_resource(res, res->start,
-						start - res->start);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(__adjust_resource(res, res->start,
+						       start - res->start));
 		} else {
-			/* split into two entries */
+			/* split into two entries - we need a new resource */
 			if (!new_res) {
-				ret = -ENOMEM;
-				break;
+				new_res = alloc_resource(GFP_ATOMIC);
+				if (!new_res) {
+					alloc_nofail = true;
+					write_unlock(&resource_lock);
+					goto retry;
+				}
 			}
 			new_res->name = res->name;
 			new_res->start = end + 1;
@@ -1339,9 +1348,8 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
 			new_res->sibling = res->sibling;
 			new_res->child = NULL;
 
-			ret = __adjust_resource(res, res->start,
-						start - res->start);
-			if (ret)
+			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(__adjust_resource(res, res->start,
+							   start - res->start)))
 				break;
 			res->sibling = new_res;
 			new_res = NULL;
@@ -1352,7 +1360,6 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
 
 	write_unlock(&resource_lock);
 	free_resource(new_res);
-	return ret;
 }
 #endif	/* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
 
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index baded53b9ff92..4c47b68a9f4b5 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1724,26 +1724,6 @@ void try_offline_node(int nid)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_offline_node);
 
-static void __release_memory_resource(resource_size_t start,
-				      resource_size_t size)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	/*
-	 * When removing memory in the same granularity as it was added,
-	 * this function never fails. It might only fail if resources
-	 * have to be adjusted or split. We'll ignore the error, as
-	 * removing of memory cannot fail.
-	 */
-	ret = release_mem_region_adjustable(&iomem_resource, start, size);
-	if (ret) {
-		resource_size_t endres = start + size - 1;
-
-		pr_warn("Unable to release resource <%pa-%pa> (%d)\n",
-			&start, &endres, ret);
-	}
-}
-
 static int __ref try_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 {
 	int rc = 0;
@@ -1777,7 +1757,7 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 		memblock_remove(start, size);
 	}
 
-	__release_memory_resource(start, size);
+	release_mem_region_adjustable(&iomem_resource, start, size);
 
 	try_offline_node(nid);
 
-- 
2.26.2


       reply	other threads:[~2020-09-11 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200911103459.10306-1-david@redhat.com>
2020-09-11 10:34 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-09-22  6:07   ` [PATCH] kernel/resource: Fix use of ternary condition in release_mem_region_adjustable Nathan Chancellor
2020-09-22  6:22     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-09  9:24     ` Wei Yang
2020-09-11 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] kernel/resource: move and rename IORESOURCE_MEM_DRIVER_MANAGED David Hildenbrand
2020-09-11 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] mm/memory_hotplug: guard more declarations by CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG David Hildenbrand
2020-09-11 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] mm/memory_hotplug: prepare passing flags to add_memory() and friends David Hildenbrand
2020-09-11 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] mm/memory_hotplug: MEMHP_MERGE_RESOURCE to specify merging of System RAM resources David Hildenbrand
2020-09-15  2:43   ` Wei Yang
2020-09-15  7:25     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-11 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] virtio-mem: try to merge system ram resources David Hildenbrand
2020-09-11 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] xen/balloon: " David Hildenbrand
2020-09-11 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] hv_balloon: " David Hildenbrand
2020-09-16  7:30 ` [PATCH] kernel/resource: make iomem_resource implicit in release_mem_region_adjustable() David Hildenbrand
2020-09-16 10:02   ` Wei Yang
2020-09-16 10:03     ` David Hildenbrand
     [not found]       ` <20200916121051.GA46809@L-31X9LVDL-1304.local>
2020-09-16 12:16         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-17  8:38   ` Pankaj Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200911103459.10306-2-david@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).