From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E86CC43461 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D73214F1 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="RZw4+7KZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725867AbgIKTix (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:38:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45112 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725828AbgIKTis (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:38:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48274C061757 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id x123so8148579pfc.7 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:38:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qaZP6m6PliEDeF0nF0A/r4O+cyZTLN4HiaGdVnnobZs=; b=RZw4+7KZntnY0JsM9KLXdwU8V/b2ZDu1qTtZ0ikbRHS0KmNTbb0KNEowrsD+eaZXBM LlW+XMPPC0WixHNWKCfsb4v1YOEKGixe3rSBCKfniGjHZgEffR6guUU3mZMzlUwNLJpv 6MecHVMi/SUQlTlsasQr+fSv9Ib+vkyMsU/k4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qaZP6m6PliEDeF0nF0A/r4O+cyZTLN4HiaGdVnnobZs=; b=GLQEulVdfB/lsvl0j3mMIU0tNyc+rBlb86iARvm1h3JmTqkUF41H2+RZ/CxNCwkUxH ByWVqMloPvPNSvkpRB91C9i6CWUflZNrv84gix9m5r6AEkpf9SBou4MvK76O+ZpRARR1 afsHil8KmuHPEbugbYPm88j/U8P6P1UmJGGIRvwLOXELREAYsTBzjRCnk5yihClO4ixU 87qlLvXMvoBkmCQ/xPUYweXs/hxKzdK9rAMjbaAxNuLMU0gUIM6R//bmRVB8+mGWjlx6 rShIRXNfGz6zXlJa4cZopEK9XLfer+skTvYmpo9SsgOmsc4CURlUpFhzZ3oW3OSud5Yn 64yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530I1GjQLJC1dEn7UI8gdFwvh8YwAlDFwV4viWsezNfP2wSeVcj1 HaLTXGOPxYgkvfs7nzuMF12/yg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXHMyFqXUriaTsd1oDPtK6lGHGDe6EoXYTZLs/6cPi5Z3ZgVaaKgJ5t0S3yWtzEgXdRqy1kQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:444d:: with SMTP id t13mr2686979pgk.404.1599853126903; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a15sm2695755pgi.69.2020.09.11.12.38.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:38:44 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Max Filippov Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Chris Zankel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xtensa: add seccomp support Message-ID: <202009111229.4A853F0@keescook> References: <20200719021654.25922-1-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200719021654.25922-1-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 07:16:51PM -0700, Max Filippov wrote: > Hello, > > this series adds support for seccomp filter on xtensa and updates > selftests/seccomp. Hi! Firstly, thanks for adding seccomp support! :) I would, however, ask that you CC maintainers on these kinds of changes for feedback. I was surprised to find the changes in the seccomp selftests today in Linus's tree. I didn't seem to get CCed on this series, even though get_maintainers shows this: $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0001-selftests-seccomp-add-xtensa-support.mbox Kees Cook (supporter:SECURE COMPUTING) Andy Lutomirski (reviewer:SECURE COMPUTING) Will Drewry (reviewer:SECURE COMPUTING) Shuah Khan (maintainer:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK) ... Regardless, I'm still glad to have more arch support! :) I'll send a follow-up patch to refactor a bit of the selftest. Thanks, -- Kees Cook