From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2632FC433E2 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 18:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A773420732 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 18:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="q1iyu72u" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727431AbgIOSdR (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:33:17 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:54364 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727895AbgIOSb4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:31:56 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0e42009474dca2b756bdd4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0e:4200:9474:dca2:b756:bdd4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 7BE5F1EC0246; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:31:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1600194711; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=x77o73At3Ov0p8rWibLOd93HG8JfU43QR0fdkYUjAlY=; b=q1iyu72uhDBKtmTnRKZLZ0RxP6EayFjaqvzZFSqc1a7rEg3nUZNcp6RIGiT8W26l9gsh5M TL3P9C5n0R2m3S3qbl1KPEI6+Ub9HKNvehduAfh+QyFWmBaD/+LoDnMq8Ke/8CVq8WL0hL SPd5zN0s0XnSt1AzL6zkya810QZzvko= Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:31:50 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, x86@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, paulmck@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, naresh.kamboju@linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Fix up ACPI processor idle vs RCU Message-ID: <20200915183150.GX14436@zn.tnic> References: <20200915103157.345404192@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200915103157.345404192@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Boris tested an earlier version of these patches and they worked for his > 32bit Atom board that was triggering complaints. Want me to test them again? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette