On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:31:54AM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 6:29 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> > What exactly is the format you're trying to describe here?  It sounds
> > like there's two blocks of padding in here (I'm assuing that's what
> > dummy means) but what's the exact arrangement here and what are the
> > commands?  It sounds like this might not work ideally with things like
> > the cache code (if it makes things seems sparser than they are) and
> > might not be obvious to someone looking at the datsheet.

> The format is

> XXXXCCCCAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDXXXX

> Where X is dont care, C is command, A is address and D is data bits. I

> Shall I add this to the commit message? I want to send a V2 anyway,
> because I screwed up the identity (ribalda.com instead of kernel.org)

Yes, please.  I was fairly sure it worked, it was just a question of if
it was ideal for the format described.  The only issue I can see with
the above is that the users will need to left shift their data - on the
face of it it would seem better to add a facility for padding the LSBs
of the data field to the core so that users can just use the data field
as documented.