Hi Clement,

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 03:55:45PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> Hi Maxime and Samuel,
> 
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 15:21, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 03:29:55PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > > On 9/10/20 9:33 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 09:54:39PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > > >> On 9/3/20 3:58 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:02:31PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> > > >>>> Hi Maxime,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 17:16, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> It really looks like the polarity of LRCK is fine though. The first word
> > > >>>>>> is sent with LRCK low, and then high, so we have channel 0 and then
> > > >>>>>> channel 1 which seems to be the proper ordering?
> > > >>
> > > >> Which image file is this in reference to?
> > > >>
> > > >>>>> Yes, that's normal.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thank you very much for this test.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> So I will revert the following commit:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> ASoC: sun4i-i2s: Fix the LRCK polarity
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> https://github.com/clementperon/linux/commit/dd657eae8164f7e4bafe8b875031a7c6c50646a9
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Like I said, the current code is working as expected with regard to the
> > > >>> LRCK polarity. The issue is that the samples are delayed and start to be
> > > >>> transmitted on the wrong phase of the signal.
> > > >>
> > > >> Since an I2S LRCK frame is radially symmetric, "wrong phase" and "inverted
> > > >> polarity" look the same. The only way to definitively distinguish them is by
> > > >> looking at the sample data.
> > > >>
> > > >> In "i2s-h6.png", the samples are all zeroes, so you're assuming that the first
> > > >> sample transmitted (that is, when the bit clock starts transitioning) was a
> > > >> "left" sample.
> > > >>
> > > >> However, in "h6-i2s-start-data.png", there are pairs of samples we can look at.
> > > >> I'm still assuming that similar samples are a left/right pair, but that's
> > > >> probably a safe assumption. Here we see the first sample in each pair is
> > > >> transmitted with LRCK *high*, and the second sample in the pair is transmitted
> > > >> with LRCK *low*. This is the opposite of your claim above.
> > > >>
> > > >> An ideal test would put left/right markers and frame numbers in the data
> > > >> channel. The Python script below can generate such a file. Then you would know
> > > >> how much startup delay there is, which channel the "first sample" came from, and
> > > >> how each channel maps to the LRCK level.
> > > >>
> > > >> It would also be helpful to test DSP_A mode, where the LRCK signal is
> > > >> asymmetric and an inversion would be obvious.
> > > >
> > > > I had no idea that there was a wave module in Python, that's a great
> > > > suggestion, thanks!
> > > >
> > > > You'll find attached the screenshots for both the I2S and DSP_A formats.
> > > > I zoomed out a bit to be able to have the first valid samples, but it
> > > > should be readable.
> > > >
> > > > The code I used is there:
> > > > https://github.com/mripard/linux/tree/sunxi/h6-i2s-test
> > > >
> > > > It's basically the v3, plus the DT bits.
> > > >
> > > > As you can see, in the i2s case, LRCK starts low and then goes up, with
> > > > the first channel (0x2*** samples) transmitted first, so everything
> > > > looks right here.
> > > >
> > > > On the DSP_A screenshot, LRCK will be low with small bursts high, and
> > > > once again with the first channel being transmitted first, so it looks
> > > > right to me too.
> > >
> > > Indeed, for H6 i2s0 with LRCK inversion in software, everything looks correct on
> > > the wire.
> > >
> > > It's still concerning to me that the BSP has no evidence of this inversion,
> > > either for i2s0 or i2s1[1]. And the inversion seems not to be required for HDMI
> > > audio on mainline either (but there could be an inversion on the HDMI side or on
> > > the interconnect).
> >
> > One can only guess here, but it's also quite easy to fix it at the card
> > level (or maybe there's a similar inversion in the codecs, or whatever).
> 
> Thanks for the test and the explanation.
> 
> Quite disturbing that there is no evidence of the LRCK inversion in
> kernel vendor indeed...
> Could it be an issue with the mainline code?

I'm not sure what you mean here, this was tested with mainline?

Maxime