From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] kvm: arm64: Duplicate arm64_ssbd_callback_required for nVHE hyp
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:59:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200918115911.GB31096@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200916173439.32265-8-dbrazdil@google.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 06:34:35PM +0100, David Brazdil wrote:
> Hyp keeps track of which cores require SSBD callback by accessing a
> kernel-proper global variable. Create an nVHE symbol of the same name
> and copy the value from kernel proper to nVHE at KVM init time.
>
> Done in preparation for separating percpu memory owned by kernel
> proper and nVHE.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 10 +++++++---
> arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h | 1 -
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> index 189839c3706a..9db93da35606 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> @@ -529,23 +529,27 @@ static inline int kvm_map_vectors(void)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD
> DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u64, arm64_ssbd_callback_required);
> +DECLARE_KVM_NVHE_PER_CPU(u64, arm64_ssbd_callback_required);
>
> -static inline int hyp_map_aux_data(void)
> +static inline int hyp_init_aux_data(void)
> {
> int cpu, err;
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> u64 *ptr;
>
> - ptr = per_cpu_ptr(&arm64_ssbd_callback_required, cpu);
> + ptr = per_cpu_ptr_nvhe(arm64_ssbd_callback_required, cpu);
> err = create_hyp_mappings(ptr, ptr + 1, PAGE_HYP);
> if (err)
> return err;
> +
> + /* Copy value from kernel to hyp. */
> + *ptr = per_cpu(arm64_ssbd_callback_required, cpu);
Hmm. Is this correct for late arriving CPUs, where we don't know whether
a callback is required at the point we do the copy?
That sounds fiddly to resolve, but this _might_ all be moot because I'm
about to post a series that allows us to remove the hyp mapping of this
variable entirely. So leave this for now, but maybe stick a comment in
that it doesn't work for late cpus.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-18 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 17:34 [PATCH v3 00/10] Independent per-CPU data section for nVHE David Brazdil
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] kvm: arm64: Partially link nVHE hyp code, simplify HYPCOPY David Brazdil
2020-09-18 8:51 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-22 17:55 ` David Brazdil
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] kvm: arm64: Move nVHE hyp namespace macros to hyp_image.h David Brazdil
2020-09-18 8:52 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] kvm: arm64: Only define __kvm_ex_table for CONFIG_KVM David Brazdil
2020-09-18 9:00 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] kvm: arm64: Remove __hyp_this_cpu_read David Brazdil
2020-09-18 9:00 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-21 13:43 ` David Brazdil
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] kvm: arm64: Remove hyp_adr/ldr_this_cpu David Brazdil
2020-09-18 9:05 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-21 14:53 ` David Brazdil
2020-09-21 17:15 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] kvm: arm64: Add helpers for accessing nVHE hyp per-cpu vars David Brazdil
2020-09-18 9:24 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] kvm: arm64: Duplicate arm64_ssbd_callback_required for nVHE hyp David Brazdil
2020-09-18 11:59 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-09-22 18:07 ` David Brazdil
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] kvm: arm64: Create separate instances of kvm_host_data for VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-09-18 11:58 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] kvm: arm64: Mark hyp stack pages reserved David Brazdil
2020-09-18 12:00 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-22 18:08 ` David Brazdil
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] kvm: arm64: Set up hyp percpu data for nVHE David Brazdil
2020-09-18 12:22 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-22 18:34 ` David Brazdil
2020-09-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] kvm: arm64: Remove unnecessary hyp mappings David Brazdil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200918115911.GB31096@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).