From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D09C4CC6B for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EDA21BE5 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:23:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600856594; bh=vbe7KhLEZRy4OEuhFJNKIUNqjK+4f7n+EAp2CYmrpyI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=ZPyg3c1tkS6FwOqkwcqqZzQVgV5z4ImeYlgEvnsbR4y3ruZcpOJCLs5Mijpsmi4IS 7VrxckjADSdxmS2el7hRzXZ+b5J0gAQM5kFNQ2ZqYYNInR665MSURIOc+U71nQm0D2 HMHUXRA6ruDDreDgcC01iHL+ez29gYCX1kPDAY7o= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726839AbgIWKXO (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 06:23:14 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45378 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726332AbgIWKXL (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 06:23:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70D10238D7; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:23:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600856591; bh=vbe7KhLEZRy4OEuhFJNKIUNqjK+4f7n+EAp2CYmrpyI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=K1hQRymbnkZkbCaJfs7jUvv1JxrUwU4Z6Nl9qJwa5StOAbwQv4gM3cVnqrE6VuDr1 6ymn5CiB7/D1c0bpifdyydecHdfJWw6nTtOlgZMLUX4FNTzjUheVGgGtb/s+VFJtAz DacfhjfPQxE1VqvdcGhcmTkd30hsdFOknC4gcMoI= Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:23:30 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Himadri Pandya Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, oneukum@suse.com, pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com, keescook@chromium.org, yuehaibing@huawei.com, petkan@nucleusys.com, ogiannou@gmail.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: usb: avoid using usb_control_msg() directly Message-ID: <20200923102330.GB3154647@kroah.com> References: <20200923090519.361-1-himadrispandya@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200923090519.361-1-himadrispandya@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:35:15PM +0530, Himadri Pandya wrote: > A recent bug-fix shaded light on possible incorrect use of > usb_control_msg() without proper error check. This resulted in > introducing new usb core api wrapper functions usb_control_msg_send() > and usb_control_msg_recv() by Greg KH. This patch series continue the > clean-up using the new functions. > > Himadri Pandya (4): > net: usbnet: use usb_control_msg_recv() and usb_control_msg_send() > net: sierra_net: use usb_control_msg_recv() > net: usb: rtl8150: use usb_control_msg_recv() and > usb_control_msg_send() > net: rndis_host: use usb_control_msg_recv() and usb_control_msg_send() > > drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c | 44 +++++++++++++--------------------- > drivers/net/usb/rtl8150.c | 32 +++++-------------------- > drivers/net/usb/sierra_net.c | 17 ++++++------- > drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c | 46 ++++-------------------------------- > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-) > Note, all of these depend on a set of patches in my usb tree, so they should probably wait to be sent to the networking developers until after 5.10-rc1 is out. thanks, greg k-h