From: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
To: <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<bsegall@google.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Remove the force parameter of update_tg_load_avg()
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:47:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200924014755.36253-1-tian.xianting@h3c.com> (raw)
In the file fair.c, sometims update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, 0) is used,
sometimes update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, false) is used.
update_tg_load_avg() has the parameter force, but in current code,
it never set 1 or true to it, so remove the force parameter.
Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 1a68a0536..7056fa97f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ void init_entity_runnable_average(struct sched_entity *se)
void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct task_struct *p)
{
}
-static void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int force)
+static void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
@@ -3288,7 +3288,6 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
/**
* update_tg_load_avg - update the tg's load avg
* @cfs_rq: the cfs_rq whose avg changed
- * @force: update regardless of how small the difference
*
* This function 'ensures': tg->load_avg := \Sum tg->cfs_rq[]->avg.load.
* However, because tg->load_avg is a global value there are performance
@@ -3300,7 +3299,7 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
*
* Updating tg's load_avg is necessary before update_cfs_share().
*/
-static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int force)
+static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
long delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib;
@@ -3310,7 +3309,7 @@ static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int force)
if (cfs_rq->tg == &root_task_group)
return;
- if (force || abs(delta) > cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib / 64) {
+ if (abs(delta) > cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib / 64) {
atomic_long_add(delta, &cfs_rq->tg->load_avg);
cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg;
}
@@ -3612,7 +3611,7 @@ static inline bool skip_blocked_update(struct sched_entity *se)
#else /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
-static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int force) {}
+static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) {}
static inline int propagate_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
{
@@ -3800,13 +3799,13 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
* IOW we're enqueueing a task on a new CPU.
*/
attach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
- update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, 0);
+ update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
} else if (decayed) {
cfs_rq_util_change(cfs_rq, 0);
if (flags & UPDATE_TG)
- update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, 0);
+ update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
}
}
@@ -7887,7 +7886,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
struct sched_entity *se;
if (update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq)) {
- update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, 0);
+ update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
if (cfs_rq == &rq->cfs)
decayed = true;
@@ -10786,7 +10785,7 @@ static void detach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se)
/* Catch up with the cfs_rq and remove our load when we leave */
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, 0);
detach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
- update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, false);
+ update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
propagate_entity_cfs_rq(se);
}
@@ -10805,7 +10804,7 @@ static void attach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se)
/* Synchronize entity with its cfs_rq */
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, sched_feat(ATTACH_AGE_LOAD) ? 0 : SKIP_AGE_LOAD);
attach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
- update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, false);
+ update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
propagate_entity_cfs_rq(se);
}
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-09-24 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-24 1:47 Xianting Tian [this message]
2020-09-25 13:17 ` [PATCH] sched/fair: Remove the force parameter of update_tg_load_avg() Phil Auld
2020-09-25 14:11 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-09-29 7:56 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Xianting Tian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200924014755.36253-1-tian.xianting@h3c.com \
--to=tian.xianting@h3c.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).