From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7E9C47420 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6C521481 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WEi+4jZW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731520AbgJAHXx (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 03:23:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48764 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725921AbgJAHXw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 03:23:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72BCBC0613D0; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 00:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id k8so3682234pfk.2; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:23:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=LrYLWDQM8stmz0yFz3Wg0u7Rhgkk0IZGCSoh4qC8NGo=; b=WEi+4jZWtcRSC7DoRUySz4lbViIHSOBrrCEPUcWUqRej/P4QjjjyRot4hI1BEllrkY uP/JYMH6mDG9HccOuI1SWE5eQDBOw5SJkGLzfQoq94tFB2JBcbA5TedKCFTDrr97+++b MAXob9d8uIvxaCwXgdu5LMXmQqxMDkcLksBLKJ9TxnF/62YPOfGNFQGiZhw0MIjJhlS3 Ll+IYCKndZwdLXZkDLdvPMknncD+URg7GGOj+XZCGZSsK684H0MP7bRovCGsxHDHFWYE 37Kdw8pGDepYQ1jsTjAoio2QxjM9/Banr+hIUpvWXWtVkO/S5ahWOtUPmESjgX5x5BXU +p7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=LrYLWDQM8stmz0yFz3Wg0u7Rhgkk0IZGCSoh4qC8NGo=; b=qPa4pGrZQwkzQAgsEL5iu9gbi6zh3EVpdUcBQiSPKYZk9H6oR8bXoKevP6q+btX9qF Bae+mNu0+KaWnRR4mXQfvfXmGaThYCVgTMmB018z+nrmYO269toyaOFcTmGQruyK5+jr kxWzyhVndCY83EkNn1l0cieN2hVxzcgyuZBpJOHcaz2ny1mgZ6lDbCdq0FN/Hji0grE8 TZ2lPfir4fkSzuwCkaDWta9MYDrgVX+8sg53+Kn3eLsqywGlXKL0oY34gx+/ZUI+5w62 wz8WX+yRhHWMdJG69/TcRtgYMLBPaVTkyl5XdGSmG9oOJ4SPkY4ClZS8tLNbmD+RMrJm h7YA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ywrCWokadB/hFyvxWWSrHSk6KvrHp1Np1r9TQ3pnHuDlndyPT xssRxZhmhcz5f6I6IzbaFaA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMyLOXMi2i32b5+lOK7RIN4L5ZLWJ8vMk6L5e/S71dxOIZstKJCsskm0686d08wPnHTn9YBg== X-Received: by 2002:a65:5802:: with SMTP id g2mr4917679pgr.261.1601537031863; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com ([2620:10d:c090:400::5:76d9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c20sm5141227pfc.209.2020.10.01.00.23.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 00:23:48 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov To: Lorenz Bauer Cc: Martin KaFai Lau , Shuah Khan , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , kernel-team , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Network Development , bpf , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] selftests: bpf: Add helper to compare socket cookies Message-ID: <20201001072348.hxhpuoqmeln6twxw@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> References: <20200928090805.23343-1-lmb@cloudflare.com> <20200928090805.23343-3-lmb@cloudflare.com> <20200929055851.n7fa3os7iu7grni3@kafai-mbp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:28:33AM +0100, Lorenz Bauer wrote: > On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 16:48, Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > ... > > > There was a warning. I noticed it while applying and fixed it up. > > Lorenz, please upgrade your compiler. This is not the first time such > > warning has been missed. > > I tried reproducing this on latest bpf-next (b0efc216f577997) with gcc > 9.3.0 by removing the initialization of duration: > > make: Entering directory '/home/lorenz/dev/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf' > TEST-OBJ [test_progs] sockmap_basic.test.o > TEST-HDR [test_progs] tests.h > EXT-OBJ [test_progs] test_progs.o > EXT-OBJ [test_progs] cgroup_helpers.o > EXT-OBJ [test_progs] trace_helpers.o > EXT-OBJ [test_progs] network_helpers.o > EXT-OBJ [test_progs] testing_helpers.o > BINARY test_progs > make: Leaving directory '/home/lorenz/dev/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf' > > So, gcc doesn't issue a warning. Jakub did the following little experiment: > > jkbs@toad ~/tmp $ cat warning.c > #include > > int main(void) > { > int duration; > > fprintf(stdout, "%d", duration); > > return 0; > } > jkbs@toad ~/tmp $ gcc -Wall -o /dev/null warning.c > warning.c: In function ‘main’: > warning.c:7:2: warning: ‘duration’ is used uninitialized in this > function [-Wuninitialized] > 7 | fprintf(stdout, "%d", duration); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > The simple case seems to work. However, adding the macro breaks things: > > jkbs@toad ~/tmp $ cat warning.c > #include > > #define _CHECK(duration) \ > ({ \ > fprintf(stdout, "%d", duration); \ > }) > #define CHECK() _CHECK(duration) > > int main(void) > { > int duration; > > CHECK(); > > return 0; > } > jkbs@toad ~/tmp $ gcc -Wall -o /dev/null warning.c > jkbs@toad ~/tmp $ That's very interesting. Thanks for the pointers. I'm using gcc version 9.1.1 20190605 (Red Hat 9.1.1-2) and I saw this warning while compiling selftests, but I don't see it with above warning.c example. clang warns correctly in both cases. > Maybe this is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 ? The > problem is still there on gcc 10. Compiling test_progs with clang does > issue a warning FWIW, but it seems like other things break when doing > that. That gcc bug has been opened since transition to ssa. That was a huge transition for gcc. But I think the bug number is not correct. It points to a different issue. I've checked -fdump-tree-uninit-all dump with and without macro. They're identical. The tree-ssa-uninit pass suppose to warn, but it doesn't. I wish I had more time to dig into it. A bit of debugging in gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.c can probably uncover the root cause.