From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 22/27] fold ep_read_events_proc() into the only caller
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 03:39:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201004023929.2740074-22-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201004023929.2740074-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index a50b48d26c55..1efe8a1a022a 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -729,14 +729,17 @@ static int ep_eventpoll_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
return 0;
}
-static __poll_t ep_read_events_proc(struct eventpoll *ep, struct list_head *head,
- int depth);
+static __poll_t ep_item_poll(const struct epitem *epi, poll_table *pt, int depth);
static __poll_t __ep_eventpoll_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait, int depth)
{
struct eventpoll *ep = file->private_data;
LIST_HEAD(txlist);
- __poll_t res;
+ struct epitem *epi, *tmp;
+ poll_table pt;
+ __poll_t res = 0;
+
+ init_poll_funcptr(&pt, NULL);
/* Insert inside our poll wait queue */
poll_wait(file, &ep->poll_wait, wait);
@@ -747,7 +750,20 @@ static __poll_t __ep_eventpoll_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait, int dep
*/
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, depth);
ep_start_scan(ep, &txlist);
- res = ep_read_events_proc(ep, &txlist, depth + 1);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(epi, tmp, &txlist, rdllink) {
+ if (ep_item_poll(epi, &pt, depth + 1)) {
+ res = EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
+ break;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Item has been dropped into the ready list by the poll
+ * callback, but it's not actually ready, as far as
+ * caller requested events goes. We can remove it here.
+ */
+ __pm_relax(ep_wakeup_source(epi));
+ list_del_init(&epi->rdllink);
+ }
+ }
ep_done_scan(ep, &txlist);
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
return res;
@@ -772,31 +788,6 @@ static __poll_t ep_item_poll(const struct epitem *epi, poll_table *pt,
return res & epi->event.events;
}
-static __poll_t ep_read_events_proc(struct eventpoll *ep, struct list_head *head,
- int depth)
-{
- struct epitem *epi, *tmp;
- poll_table pt;
-
- init_poll_funcptr(&pt, NULL);
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(epi, tmp, head, rdllink) {
- if (ep_item_poll(epi, &pt, depth)) {
- return EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
- } else {
- /*
- * Item has been dropped into the ready list by the poll
- * callback, but it's not actually ready, as far as
- * caller requested events goes. We can remove it here.
- */
- __pm_relax(ep_wakeup_source(epi));
- list_del_init(&epi->rdllink);
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static __poll_t ep_eventpoll_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
{
return __ep_eventpoll_poll(file, wait, 0);
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-04 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-04 2:36 [RFC][PATCHSET] epoll cleanups Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 01/27] epoll: switch epitem->pwqlist to single-linked list Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 02/27] epoll: get rid of epitem->nwait Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 03/27] untangling ep_call_nested(): get rid of useless arguments Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 04/27] untangling ep_call_nested(): it's all serialized on epmutex Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 05/27] untangling ep_call_nested(): take pushing cookie into a helper Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 06/27] untangling ep_call_nested(): move push/pop of cookie into the callbacks Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 07/27] untangling ep_call_nested(): and there was much rejoicing Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 08/27] reverse_path_check_proc(): sane arguments Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 09/27] reverse_path_check_proc(): don't bother with cookies Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 10/27] clean reverse_path_check_proc() a bit Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 11/27] ep_loop_check_proc(): lift pushing the cookie into callers Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 12/27] get rid of ep_push_nested() Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 13/27] ep_loop_check_proc(): saner calling conventions Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 14/27] ep_scan_ready_list(): prepare to splitup Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 15/27] lift the calls of ep_read_events_proc() into the callers Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 16/27] lift the calls of ep_send_events_proc() " Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 17/27] ep_send_events_proc(): fold into the caller Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 18/27] lift locking/unlocking ep->mtx out of ep_{start,done}_scan() Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 19/27] ep_insert(): don't open-code ep_remove() on failure exits Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 20/27] ep_insert(): we only need tep->mtx around the insertion itself Al Viro
2020-10-04 12:56 ` [ep_insert()] 9ee1cc5666: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected kernel test robot
2020-10-04 14:17 ` Al Viro
2020-10-04 14:27 ` Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 21/27] take the common part of ep_eventpoll_poll() and ep_item_poll() into helper Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` Al Viro [this message]
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 23/27] ep_insert(): move creation of wakeup source past the fl_ep_links insertion Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 24/27] convert ->f_ep_links/->fllink to hlist Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 25/27] lift rcu_read_lock() into reverse_path_check() Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 26/27] epoll: massage the check list insertion Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 27/27] epoll: take epitem list out of struct file Al Viro
2020-10-05 20:37 ` Qian Cai
2020-10-05 20:49 ` Al Viro
2020-10-04 2:49 ` [RFC][PATCHSET] epoll cleanups Al Viro
2020-10-04 12:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-04 14:15 ` Al Viro
2020-10-04 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-04 20:05 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201004023929.2740074-22-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).