From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60549C4363A for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A08206DD for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="DqwHrtUl" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728563AbgJEPht (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:37:49 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:59748 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727942AbgJEPcD (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:32:03 -0400 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 095FVkal088655; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:31:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1601911906; bh=dgLCDmGqqsDBbyMIliBwVzUNzePc3HpV7xTby1yCRi8=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=DqwHrtUle3ehrtRuOTLNxtaiusyOQjQXdezu8mFJqFKCfoS/A0U6801GDxF0g264h HPLDscXm3n2bz1q6PUW3HCmEp3Kd2heC0K2B/ST8AkcB9meQN8pOPtSe5IzUSAwiBJ Ooh79LTA+ZexqzaCv/XPUBdJBjUS6C/QXOPaE2oU= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 095FVkRx038808 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:31:46 -0500 Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:31:45 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:31:45 -0500 Received: from pratyush-OptiPlex-790.dhcp.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 095FVdlh052390; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:31:43 -0500 From: Pratyush Yadav To: Tudor Ambarus , Miquel Raynal , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , , CC: Pratyush Yadav , Sekhar Nori , Boris Brezillon Subject: [PATCH v16 01/15] mtd: spi-nor: core: use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 21:01:24 +0530 Message-ID: <20201005153138.6437-2-p.yadav@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20201005153138.6437-1-p.yadav@ti.com> References: <20201005153138.6437-1-p.yadav@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code. Using EOPNOTSUPP is preferred in its stead. Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus --- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c index 0369d98b2d12..4d0f8d165544 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c @@ -2281,7 +2281,7 @@ static int spi_nor_hwcaps_pp2cmd(u32 hwcaps) *@nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor' *@op: pointer to op template to be checked * - * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise. + * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise. */ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor, struct spi_mem_op *op) @@ -2295,12 +2295,12 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor, op->addr.nbytes = 4; if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op)) { if (nor->mtd.size > SZ_16M) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; /* If flash size <= 16MB, 3 address bytes are sufficient */ op->addr.nbytes = 3; if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op)) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; } return 0; @@ -2312,7 +2312,7 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor, *@nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor' *@read: pointer to op template to be checked * - * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise. + * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise. */ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_readop(struct spi_nor *nor, const struct spi_nor_read_command *read) @@ -2338,7 +2338,7 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_readop(struct spi_nor *nor, *@nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor' *@pp: pointer to op template to be checked * - * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise. + * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise. */ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_pp(struct spi_nor *nor, const struct spi_nor_pp_command *pp) -- 2.28.0