From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19F4C4727D for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 21:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B599420756 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 21:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="QVnZNjf3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729291AbgJEVQs (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:16:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46068 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725795AbgJEVQs (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:16:48 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38A5CC0613CE; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f07d500e8a8b27a6c9dedad.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f07:d500:e8a8:b27a:6c9d:edad]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id D75051EC043F; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 23:16:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1601932605; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=dE3g1QnWgOyBwTq45i2ttuO0EC2fpZHAT0HKDBoHGUA=; b=QVnZNjf3hbhaQZ4AgwqcSctRmixErRDP8UYZ9c7E0CdGyUxAFaEGdF7NPj1DCG6VPV78oM dmThDG3RA38hv75xuh/Zphl/Meg3RhkNrcXmf2LeT0K41ziD5b86YzEYYllLdaSKq3+MIz JpTr1D7F/pW6mDjsFTDXN3+Xwzm8sZk= Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 23:16:36 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Mike Travis Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, Steve Wahl , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Dimitri Sivanich , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "H. Peter Anvin" , Russ Anderson , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Alexandre Chartre , Jian Cai , Vitaly Kuznetsov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/13] x86/platform/uv: Adjust references in UV kernel modules Message-ID: <20201005211611.GK21151@zn.tnic> References: <20201005203929.148656-1-mike.travis@hpe.com> <20201005203929.148656-4-mike.travis@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201005203929.148656-4-mike.travis@hpe.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 03:39:19PM -0500, Mike Travis wrote: > Make a small symbol change (is_uv() ==> is_uv_sys()) to accommodate a > change in the uv_mmrs.h file (is_uv() is the new arch selector function). > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis > Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich > Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl > --- > drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h | 8 ++++---- > drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_main.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_uv.c | 6 ++++-- > drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_main.c | 6 +++--- > drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_partition.c | 2 +- > drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpnet.c | 2 +- > 6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h > index 06469b12aced..0af267baf031 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h > +++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h > @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ > > #if defined CONFIG_X86_UV || defined CONFIG_IA64_SGI_UV > #include > -#define is_uv() is_uv_system() > +#define is_uv_sys() is_uv_system() Do I see it correctly that you can simply use is_uv_system() directly instead of this macro indirection? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette