From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
George Popescu <georgepope@android.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ubsan: Move cc-option tests into Kconfig
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 23:01:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202010052258.96765BC83@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201004070847.GA1650@Ryzen-9-3900X.localdomain>
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 12:08:47AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:15:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Instead of doing if/endif blocks with cc-option calls in the UBSAN
> > Makefile, move all the tests into Kconfig and use the Makefile to
> > collect the results.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjPasyJrDuwDnpHJS2TuQfExwe=px-SzLeN8GFMAQJPmQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
> I tested menuconfig to make sure all the flags when CONFIG_UBSAN_MISC is
> flipped.
>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Awesome, thank you!
> One comment below.
>
> > [...]
> > diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
> > index 9716dab06bc7..72862da47baf 100644
> > --- a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
> > +++ b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
> > @@ -1,37 +1,21 @@
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> > -export CFLAGS_UBSAN :=
> > +# -fsanitize=* options makes GCC less smart than usual and
> > +# increases the number of 'maybe-uninitialized' false-positives.
> > +ubsan-cflags-$(CONFIG_UBSAN) += $(call cc-disable-warning, maybe-uninitialized)
>
> Is this just to force -Wno-maybe-uninitialized even when W=2?
> -Wmaybe-uninitialized is already disabled globally after
> commit 78a5255ffb6a ("Stop the ad-hoc games with
> -Wno-maybe-initialized"). I feel like it might be worth a comment in
> case that changes in the future but maybe that is a bit much.
>
> > [...]
> > - # -fsanitize=* options makes GCC less smart than usual and
> > - # increase number of 'maybe-uninitialized false-positives
> > - CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -Wno-maybe-uninitialized)
It's just a direct copying of the existing logic, but into the new
"ubsan-cflags-y" style. But yes, AFAICT, that was the intent when it was
added in commit a76bcf557ef4 ("Kbuild: enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized
warning for "make W=1"").
So for this patch, I kept the logic as it was.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-06 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-02 22:15 [PATCH 0/4] Clean up UBSAN Makefile Kees Cook
2020-10-02 22:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] ubsan: Move cc-option tests into Kconfig Kees Cook
2020-10-04 7:08 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-10-06 6:01 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-10-02 22:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] ubsan: Disable object-size sanitizer under GCC Kees Cook
2020-10-04 7:10 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-10-02 22:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] ubsan: Force -Wno-maybe-uninitialized only for GCC Kees Cook
2020-10-04 7:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-10-06 6:03 ` Kees Cook
2020-10-02 22:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] ubsan: Disable UBSAN_TRAP for all*config Kees Cook
2020-10-04 7:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202010052258.96765BC83@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=georgepope@android.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).