From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91478C04EBE for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 07:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3688C2168B for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 07:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="PyZni2Zi" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726659AbgJHH3R (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2020 03:29:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48000 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725849AbgJHH3R (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2020 03:29:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com (mail-wm1-x341.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5718C0613D2 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 00:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id d4so5297462wmd.5 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:29:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=83OQc7yj1ycxNTqltziVLrghBwISxh6MY5DYj2Gusr8=; b=PyZni2Zig8mPvwxEQBVJ4I67bKxcD4vwVJR47XIlRlSXEuOUq4n7MVlTpfNC0GWLDH l4T6OetvE+jrEHdNqux3z2DndvxLy6QNO7lAMKBKHqYds/8Jqrlp46ktC+THd1G3FbPa +JphX/earyN9jx2cjoo7ywgYLcju/BZOHSAP+PUQLRWZROopETRrIckziHxV0vfdzQSP i2ARfAOYhLWpEHsiYf0+Ace0FQsVF7JVIfNtfnRuxDCArmnIerEuaUc9JtLm7DHSB0F5 ubxE0k94gwYz8Y8702i1x9AUVudi1Sbw2p7VOrK060w6EHqch1a7hnkwNLGK6J6IPLVf 4S8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=83OQc7yj1ycxNTqltziVLrghBwISxh6MY5DYj2Gusr8=; b=Y1g+5HvE39S1SP4w/98ytjoKNZxmp4rLLkBnb4JjLtJ5tSFYomXp+tzVfS+5s7FVps 3/UTfLA+jzxRuSCKe8mheAez4da82lNqA94JoQ0DisZ18Y0c0xZJ82bmr1GNoLLoJkXx sQUVHIufuW2EJkzrTSiy86lr68bAZOXjqYJXPf8HQ1pn/I7NLrvoib4ue2TohNgnT+Fu 1K4tk5Oa7a3+177J0HlsxdfII+KxTKeCDXSQ4NBNRLILDTd4gXTyovR0fQgjq72BeoIb 7y8AlJLbl+//gmObr6tUva7CpSEu9JTlv17QYXR6NeFc18DbesrnBRoMTV23Tpgg/SKZ 1uMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DpEubYXutG+w3R5nZ//bEz6mCyCgtYKYfPP40PX/6ojjvlJr9 pob2eUScGZtvV3NDueDq5maAhg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuC3XwwRXUfeZuE1phg/rUbjcM5TrrxmGrK81G52/bQqiA/CR6+U3wLYGb34QTxTgS95ZQkw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:28a:: with SMTP id 132mr7184593wmc.9.1602142155147; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:29:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 1sm6266201wre.61.2020.10.08.00.29.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 08:29:12 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Hans de Goede Cc: "David E. Box" , Bjorn Helgaas , dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org, bhelgaas@google.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com, Andy Shevchenko , rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/5] PCI: Add defines for Designated Vendor-Specific Extended Capability Message-ID: <20201008072912.GE1763265@dell> References: <20201007005118.GA3230211@bjorn-Precision-5520> <20201007065451.GB6148@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 07 Oct 2020, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/7/20 8:54 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, David E. Box wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 19:51 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:45:54PM -0700, David E. Box wrote: > > > > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > > > > > > > This patch has been acked and unchanged for weeks. Is it possible > > > > > to > > > > > get this pulled into next? We have SIOV and CXL related work that > > > > > is > > > > > using these definitions. Thanks. > > > > > > > > I acked it because I expected you to merge it along with the rest of > > > > the series. > > > > > > > > I guess I could merge this patch via the PCI tree if you really want, > > > > but that ends up being a hassle because we have to worry about which > > > > order things get merged to Linus' tree. Better if the whole series > > > > is > > > > merged via the same tree. > > > > > > Agreed. The hope is that this series is ready for the next merge window > > > but no ack yet on V8. And if the series does not make it I'd like this > > > patch to at least get in. > > > > If Bjorn is happy to take this patch so late in the release cycle then > > please go ahead. The other patches are due for v5.11. > > I agree (that the other patches are for 5.11) talking about merging > this series patch 2 is a mfd patch and patches 3-5 are drivers/platform/x86 > patches. > > Lee, FYI I'm taking over drivers/platform/x86 maintainership from Andy. Congratulations, Hans. > I suggest that we merge the entire series through a single tree > (with acks or reviewed-by-s from the other maintainer) > either through the mfd tree or through the drivers/platform/x86 > tree. Since most changes are in drivers/platform/x86 the latter > probably makes more sense, but either way works for me. > So how would you like to proceed with this series ? I'm happy either way, but bear in mind that, due to the intrinsic heterogeneous nature of MFD, I already have infrastructure to easily apply (and send pull-requests for) cross-subsystem patch-sets. If however, you decide that you'd really like to take the set, that's also fine but I will require a pull-request from an immutable branch. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog