From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH] slub: Actually fix freelist pointer vs redzoning
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 16:34:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201008233443.3335464-1-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
It turns out that SLUB redzoning ("slub_debug=Z") checks from
s->object_size rather than from s->inuse (which is normally bumped to
make room for the freelist pointer), so a cache created with an object
size less than 24 would have their freelist pointer written beyond
s->object_size, causing the redzone to corrupt the freelist pointer.
This was very visible with "slub_debug=ZF":
BUG test (Tainted: G B ): Redzone overwritten
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO: 0xffff957ead1c05de-0xffff957ead1c05df @offset=1502. First byte 0x1a instead of 0xbb
INFO: Slab 0xffffef3950b47000 objects=170 used=170 fp=0x0000000000000000 flags=0x8000000000000200
INFO: Object 0xffff957ead1c05d8 @offset=1496 fp=0xffff957ead1c0620
Redzone (____ptrval____): bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ........
Object (____ptrval____): 00 00 00 00 00 f6 f4 a5 ........
Redzone (____ptrval____): 40 1d e8 1a aa @....
Padding (____ptrval____): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
Adjust the offset to stay within s->object_size.
(Note that there appear to be no such small-sized caches in the kernel
currently.)
Reported-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200807160627.GA1420741@elver.google.com/
Fixes: 89b83f282d8b (slub: avoid redzone when choosing freepointer location)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
mm/slub.c | 17 +++++------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 68c02b2eecd9..979f5da26992 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3641,7 +3641,6 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order)
{
slab_flags_t flags = s->flags;
unsigned int size = s->object_size;
- unsigned int freepointer_area;
unsigned int order;
/*
@@ -3650,13 +3649,6 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order)
* the possible location of the free pointer.
*/
size = ALIGN(size, sizeof(void *));
- /*
- * This is the area of the object where a freepointer can be
- * safely written. If redzoning adds more to the inuse size, we
- * can't use that portion for writing the freepointer, so
- * s->offset must be limited within this for the general case.
- */
- freepointer_area = size;
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
/*
@@ -3682,7 +3674,7 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order)
/*
* With that we have determined the number of bytes in actual use
- * by the object. This is the potential offset to the free pointer.
+ * by the object and redzoning.
*/
s->inuse = size;
@@ -3694,7 +3686,8 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order)
* kmem_cache_free.
*
* This is the case if we do RCU, have a constructor or
- * destructor or are poisoning the objects.
+ * destructor, are poisoning the objects, or are
+ * redzoning an object smaller than sizeof(void *).
*
* The assumption that s->offset >= s->inuse means free
* pointer is outside of the object is used in the
@@ -3703,13 +3696,13 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order)
*/
s->offset = size;
size += sizeof(void *);
- } else if (freepointer_area > sizeof(void *)) {
+ } else {
/*
* Store freelist pointer near middle of object to keep
* it away from the edges of the object to avoid small
* sized over/underflows from neighboring allocations.
*/
- s->offset = ALIGN(freepointer_area / 2, sizeof(void *));
+ s->offset = ALIGN_DOWN(s->object_size / 2, sizeof(void *));
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-08 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 23:34 Kees Cook [this message]
2020-10-09 12:12 ` [PATCH] slub: Actually fix freelist pointer vs redzoning Marco Elver
2020-10-15 2:36 ` Waiman Long
2020-10-15 3:08 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201008233443.3335464-1-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).