From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D48DC433DF for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D47207C3 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Gb4QN4dW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387816AbgJNLQy (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:16:54 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:22794 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729372AbgJNLQx (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:16:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602674212; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/KujEL9OO4RQnyINjYD02F7cN+kUA8e37LwN9pBzAAk=; b=Gb4QN4dWPCN9j6VTCzyqrfYisYNgrzhDJIvuqoZCkSswxL3gDAJ/FZitDjvZm0fDjBMx3W JwoqcKIxWaWIb7Q7VvKYXtHY43qKryPErSeTMH5fKahBi4WNmZ3cMZW24fzCm/S16nCLls VO7SjFZKnVXL8rkCeBFlIPzWzwUsYIk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-288-rXS71b4FPcCjUMvl-WhNTA-1; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:16:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rXS71b4FPcCjUMvl-WhNTA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F0908014D9; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.40.195.92]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A0B025D9D3; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:16:39 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: John Garry Cc: kajoljain , "acme@kernel.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "irogers@google.com" , "leo.yan@linaro.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com" , "namhyung@kernel.org" , "mathieu.poirier@linaro.org" , Linuxarm , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com" , Zhangshaokun , "james.clark@arm.com" , "linux-imx@nxp.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for system PMUs Message-ID: <20201014111639.GA1375972@krava> References: <1602152121-240367-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1f1c4537-2224-cd83-a10a-947ef8cd2864@linux.ibm.com> <2ca3d31e-478f-5e0a-dd36-37e84e4abf7c@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2ca3d31e-478f-5e0a-dd36-37e84e4abf7c@huawei.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 12:49:15PM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 08/10/2020 12:27, kajoljain wrote: > > Hi John, > > I am looking into these patches, it seems they are not re-based on top of > > latest Arnaldo's perf/core branch. Can you rebase these changes. I think we are missing > > multiple updates. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Kajol Jain > > > > Hi Kajol Jain, > > My thought was that since the kernel part needs acceptance first [0], which > is based on v5.9-rc7, I would just use the same baseline here. > > However I suppose I should still use Arnaldo's perf/core from now on as > baseline, so I'll look at that now. yes please, I can't already apply 2nd patch.. patching file pmu-events/jevents.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 82 with fuzz 2 (offset 29 lines). Hunk #2 FAILED at 335. Hunk #3 FAILED at 354. Hunk #4 succeeded at 406 (offset 22 lines). Hunk #5 FAILED at 439. Hunk #6 FAILED at 531. Hunk #7 FAILED at 555. Hunk #8 FAILED at 602. Hunk #9 FAILED at 698. Hunk #10 succeeded at 770 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 813 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 1075 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #13 succeeded at 1242 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #14 succeeded at 1273 (offset 2 lines). 7 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file pmu-events/jevents.c.rej can't find file to patch at input line 439 thanks, jirka