Re: Dts for eth network based on marvell's mv88e6390x crashes Xilinx's linux-kernel v5.4

[Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>]

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 03:31:52PM +0300, michael alayev wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This is my system's network topology. It relies on Xilinx's Zynq-7000 soc.
> 
> zynq-7000      switch1       switch2
>  (cpu)       mv88e6390x    mv88e6390x
> -------      ---------     ---------
> |     |      |       |     |       |
> | gem0|------|p0  p10|-----|p10    |
> |     |      |       |     |       |
> |     |      ---------     ---------
> |     |         |mdio_addr=2   | mdio_addr=3
> |     |         |              |
> |     |-------------------------
> |     |    |
> |     |    |              mv88e1510(phy)
> |     |    |  mdio_addr=1 --------
> |     |    ---------------|      |
> |     |                   |      |
> | gem1|-------------------|      |
> |     |                   |      |
> |     |                   --------
> -------
> 
> I have built a v5.4 linux kernel for it and its ethernet network defined in the device-tree as follows
> 
> (arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts gem0 and gem1)   :
> 
> &gem0 {
> status = "okay";
> phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
> phy-handle = <&phy0>;
> 
> 
> mdio {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> 
> phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
> compatible = "marvell";
> reg = <0>;
> device_type = "ethernet-phy";
> fixed-link {
> speed = <1000>;
> full-duplex;
> };
> };
> 
> debug_phy: ethernet-phy@1 {
> compatible = "marvell";
> reg = <1>;
> device_type = "ethernet-phy";
> label = "debug-phy";
> };

Hi Michael

This is pretty unreadable with all the white space removed. Please
could you post again with the white space.

> 
> Starting kernel ...
> ...
> [   40.953876] [<c05ab9cc>] (dsa_unregister_switch) from [<c042c980>] (mv88e6xxx_remove+0x1c/0x6c)
> [   40.962602] [<c042c980>] (mv88e6xxx_remove) from [<c042572c>] (mdio_remove+0x1c/0x38)
> [   40.970457] [<c042572c>] (mdio_remove) from [<c03cb4a4>] (device_release_driver_internal+0xf0/0x194)
> [   40.979612] [<c03cb4a4>] (device_release_driver_internal) from [<c03ca1e8>] (bus_remove_device+0xcc/0xdc)
> [   40.989201] [<c03ca1e8>] (bus_remove_device) from [<c03c7108>] (device_del+0x170/0x288)
> [   40.997227] [<c03c7108>] (device_del) from [<c0425674>] (mdio_device_remove+0xc/0x18)
> [   41.005073] [<c0425674>] (mdio_device_remove) from [<c0425024>] (mdiobus_unregister+0x50/0x84)
> [   41.013714] [<c0425024>] (mdiobus_unregister) from [<c043ac2c>] (macb_probe+0x88c/0xa68)
> [   41.021834] [<c043ac2c>] (macb_probe) from [<c03cc6d0>] (platform_drv_probe+0x48/0x98)
> [   41.029771] [<c03cc6d0>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c03cad04>] (really_probe+0x140/0x2f8)
> [   41.038060] [<c03cad04>] (really_probe) from [<c03cb110>] (driver_probe_device+0x10c/0x154)
> [   41.046427] [<c03cb110>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c03cb2e4>] (device_driver_attach+0x44/0x5c)
> [   41.055316] [<c03cb2e4>] (device_driver_attach) from [<c03cb3a8>] (__driver_attach+0xac/0xb8)
> [   41.063856] [<c03cb3a8>] (__driver_attach) from [<c03c93b8>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa0)
> [   41.072049] [<c03c93b8>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c03ca2d4>] (bus_add_driver+0xdc/0x1bc)
> [   41.080244] [<c03ca2d4>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c03cba60>] (driver_register+0xb0/0xf8)
> [   41.088266] [<c03cba60>] (driver_register) from [<c01026e0>] (do_one_initcall+0x74/0x164)
> [   41.096469] [<c01026e0>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c0800e38>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x108/0x1d8)
> [   41.105192] [<c0800e38>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c05e829c>] (kernel_init+0x8/0x110)
> [   41.113391] [<c05e829c>] (kernel_init) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)

This looks like the classic first time probe -EPROBE_DEFER. You expect
this path to happen, but not the invalid access. macb_probe will
register the mdio bus which causes the switches to probe. But because
macb_probe has not got so far as to call register_netdev, the gem
interface is not available, so DSA ends up returning
EPROBE_DEFER. What normally happens is that macb_probe continues, and
registers the network interface. The switches get probed again later
and it all works.

The real question is, why does the unroll go wrong when -EPROBE_DEFER
is returned?

   Andrew