From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C235BC43457 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A7B2224D for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729059AbgJSIbL (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:31:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.h3c.com ([60.191.123.50]:45106 "EHLO h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728871AbgJSIbK (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:31:10 -0400 Received: from DAG2EX03-BASE.srv.huawei-3com.com ([10.8.0.66]) by h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com with ESMTPS id 09J8USuc021549 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:30:28 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from tian.xianting@h3c.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.99.212.201) by DAG2EX03-BASE.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.8.0.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:30:31 +0800 From: Xianting Tian To: , CC: , , , Xianting Tian Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: remove the calling of local_memory_node() Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:20:47 +0800 Message-ID: <20201019082047.31113-1-tian.xianting@h3c.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.99.212.201] X-ClientProxiedBy: BJSMTP02-EX.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.63.20.133) To DAG2EX03-BASE.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.8.0.66) X-DNSRBL: X-MAIL: h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com 09J8USuc021549 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We don't need to check whether the node is memoryless numa node before calling allocator interface. SLUB(and SLAB,SLOB) relies on the page allocator to pick a node. Page allocator should deal with memoryless nodes just fine. It has zonelists constructed for each possible nodes. And it will automatically fall back into a node which is closest to the requested node. As long as __GFP_THISNODE is not enforced of course. The code comments of kmem_cache_alloc_node() of SLAB also showed this: * Fallback to other node is possible if __GFP_THISNODE is not set. blk-mq code doesn't set __GFP_THISNODE, so we can remove the calling of local_memory_node(). Fixes: bffed457160ab ("blk-mq: Avoid memoryless numa node encoded in hctx numa_node") Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian --- block/blk-mq-cpumap.c | 2 +- block/blk-mq.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c index 0157f2b34..3db84d319 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c +++ b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int blk_mq_hw_queue_to_node(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap, unsigned int index) for_each_possible_cpu(i) { if (index == qmap->mq_map[i]) - return local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(i)); + return cpu_to_node(i); } return NUMA_NO_NODE; diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index cdced4aca..48f8366b2 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2737,7 +2737,7 @@ static void blk_mq_init_cpu_queues(struct request_queue *q, for (j = 0; j < set->nr_maps; j++) { hctx = blk_mq_map_queue_type(q, j, i); if (nr_hw_queues > 1 && hctx->numa_node == NUMA_NO_NODE) - hctx->numa_node = local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(i)); + hctx->numa_node = cpu_to_node(i); } } } -- 2.17.1