From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BDCC433DF for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E481E223FD for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:40:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603140053; bh=Uw6z0L+vbpRHU1EORPmt0ZY0vv0X5pRrlNUeifp5qyk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=B6ljkslv6wVZA0epVAbMc6pvYaeYOqzjvX8lKaAA+b5gE2wmHAzcBN8nuONW8uBbU DyNyXVtolRzDtle5evSi5dRMh6wlmw2nRYemH88gS/6TZVDdZot3zPE2AG/mw1JULL /vMYOFaLj/4SOJyoLHE1v/Zz99KKTzvmZK2994Ak= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731659AbgJSUkv (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:40:51 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48390 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726652AbgJSUkv (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:40:51 -0400 Received: from kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com (c-67-180-217-166.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.217.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2E54223EA; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:40:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603140051; bh=Uw6z0L+vbpRHU1EORPmt0ZY0vv0X5pRrlNUeifp5qyk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Bk2f+AkhiG3y/v0+VBUoC4vhpjsi0qG02mroI4Hte7txqcWnTW14nin9Wx5mvw7ZD QIcqBv80EOyHYqU830qa9ee3fim4O4xrrj/HC2kaRw/YyhmeuVpUVmQi+JTxmQ/D5j iEdofx+d1lbgwpYzotdIllt3u3A4imb7VepOvXNM= Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:40:48 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: Geliang Tang , Mat Martineau , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Peter Krystad , netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [MPTCP][PATCH net-next 0/2] init ahmac and port of mptcp_options_received Message-ID: <20201019134048.11c75c9a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <7766357d-0838-1603-9967-8910aa312f65@tessares.net> References: <7766357d-0838-1603-9967-8910aa312f65@tessares.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:27:55 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Geliang, > > On 19/10/2020 12:23, Geliang Tang wrote: > > This patchset deals with initializations of mptcp_options_received's two > > fields, ahmac and port. > > > > Geliang Tang (2): > > mptcp: initialize mptcp_options_received's ahmac > > mptcp: move mptcp_options_received's port initialization > > Thank you for these two patches. They look good to me except one detail: > these two patches are for -net and not net-next. > > I don't know if it is alright for Jakub to apply them to -net or if it > is clearer to re-send them with an updated subject. > > If it is OK to apply them to -net without a re-submit, here is my: > > Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts Thanks, I can apply to net. > Also, if you don't mind and while I am here, I never know: is it OK for > you the maintainers to send one Acked/Reviewed-by for a whole series -- > but then this is not reflected on patchwork -- or should we send one tag > for each patch? It's fine, we propagate those semi-manually, but it's not a problem. Hopefully patchwork will address this at some point :(