From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E32C433E7 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594F32231B for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730100AbgJSP07 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:26:59 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:38590 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729075AbgJSP06 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:26:58 -0400 IronPort-SDR: IQkfUETGL72+XlVqdfgh78+jp+OuNaBO04hpE+rzKHqqnyx8gIZObhHYjDqbqXt05r0JOkQB9m tcVdJ8+hAoFA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9778"; a="184661539" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,394,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="184661539" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Oct 2020 08:26:58 -0700 IronPort-SDR: X/puYn9tz2AVmatKIqgYLOxOfIFTADFCC1BNhCc8B8Xosq7FGkUh6Czzqn3sC71GTPpxnm4shC p0DH/9jkG+yw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,394,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="347467027" Received: from pl-dbox.sh.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.239.159.39]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2020 08:26:56 -0700 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:24:11 +0800 From: Philip Li To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Rong Chen , Anton Blanchard , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel , lkp , 0day robot , Ying Huang , Zhengjun Xing Subject: Re: [LKP] Unreliable will-it-scale context_switch1 test on 0day bot Message-ID: <20201019152410.GA14293@intel.com> References: <104775100.27222.1603114052224.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <104775100.27222.1603114052224.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:27:32AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi, > > I pointed out an issue with the will-it-scale context_switch1 test run by the 0day bot on > October 7, 2020, and got no reply. Thanks Mathieu for the feedback, we had added it to the TODO list but sorry for not reply in time. Zhengjun, can you help follow up this mail thread? > > Until this issue is solved, the results of those tests are basically pure noise when run on > SMT hardware: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1183082664.11002.1602082242482.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com/ > > Who is maintaining those tests and the 0day bot ? will-it-scale itself is from community at https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale and we will look for the support if we don't have quick solution. 0day bot basically wraps the test and analyze the result to find which commit leads to change. > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com > _______________________________________________ > LKP mailing list -- lkp@lists.01.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@lists.01.org