From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4E9C561F8 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 05:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FE5223C7 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 05:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="oftk9kwa" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2440669AbgJUF5q (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 01:57:46 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:39735 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2394425AbgJUF5p (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 01:57:45 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CGKXM1Q5Gz9sSC; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:57:39 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1603259863; bh=mkLwb6kYwQ5MuroG8erdEQ/q9dFxwaXcp8HOCQlFz1o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oftk9kwaznnWGT5R4ERP84VjA88qUyCKap8AoP+wGfibOEhmSJLrDGuFebks+JhBU Yl2AIoqmupABt314t71hQRu1GidmRFmsW8fmUPzIZJzHaxnRAm796dtCBPU8e7isGF csooTmikT+1/gbscxO/rhVeMAWpBI0rGOucCJr1O1Qiuncz6pxH1LNiQIztBT85q6E V82XrX6wffAj7IqIVhRKJcUVJ7Bh9s87H3f6BgGy/FkNgUaB8j/Nd3z/sENeEr33KB vg/dlhJrI8qrQWPKzfwhfUrHz8GqTKpcPuQo2xOeIvBHvpQ6LVa6d+rk8zvuEK8CbC Lj8EqMLViJN+w== Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:57:37 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Netdev , bpf , Linux ARM , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon Subject: Re: arm64 build broken on linux next 20201021 - include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:862:26: error: array index in initializer exceeds array bounds Message-ID: <20201021165737.4d1ad838@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/vsMUGu8oXuZ.cm_zXu.FKjI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/vsMUGu8oXuZ.cm_zXu.FKjI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Naresh, On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:35:10 +0530 Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > arm64 build broken while building linux next 20201021 tag. >=20 > include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:862:26: error: array index in > initializer exceeds array bounds > #define __NR_watch_mount 441 Yeah, the __NR_syscalls in include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h needed to be fixed up in the notifications tree merge to be 442. Sorry about that, I will use the correct merge resolution tomorrow. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/vsMUGu8oXuZ.cm_zXu.FKjI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl+PzdEACgkQAVBC80lX 0GyPywf/eOyBnEM2pUsqMWeBkDZe16m8CuoJYhbnpwflfBozng3GxkRWKdPv4Rhi //GTB5VrdFww/QJDlBLQpZO8c+ROedFYTwGCXuCjGm0DRbLsM9M+ZnCiMG44wgvk dCeCMmtzNfa9vhJAdKCmXeIiqwO4zyynkn1c/WHNSPLp5SfaBsZYyn4Oc4Rh5fuN O0ZsRGEpaTvr30L01hAOoj1XhR4mf/SI/tYPyVHveglKYw6A7ObLWbHK6oytVAVU Ez44wifav6vPxCoouWsJ0v56fsB0BCmqRAaEC6Zg9cs9J1vUneScsn5NM5IWwk49 e6jyMR/MaJzqiZjWNn1BApxzap7oRw== =sb06 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/vsMUGu8oXuZ.cm_zXu.FKjI--