From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] perf/arch: Remove perf_sample_data::regs_user_copy
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:13:50 +0100
Message-ID: <20201030151955.258178461@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201030151345.540479897@infradead.org>
struct perf_sample_data lives on-stack, we should be careful about it's
size. Furthermore, the pt_regs copy in there is only because x86_64 is a
trainwreck, solve it differently.
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 15 +++++++++++----
include/linux/perf_event.h | 6 ------
include/linux/perf_regs.h | 6 ++----
kernel/events/core.c | 8 +++-----
10 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -73,8 +73,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
--- a/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -144,8 +144,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = (regs_user->regs) ? perf_reg_abi(current) :
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/*
* Use the regs from the first interruption and let
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -101,8 +101,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
@@ -129,12 +128,20 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64;
}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, nmi_user_regs);
+
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy = this_cpu_ptr(&nmi_user_regs);
struct pt_regs *user_regs = task_pt_regs(current);
+ if (!in_nmi()) {
+ regs_user->regs = user_regs;
+ regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
+ return;
+ }
+
/*
* If we're in an NMI that interrupted task_pt_regs setup, then
* we can't sample user regs at all. This check isn't really
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1022,13 +1022,7 @@ struct perf_sample_data {
struct perf_callchain_entry *callchain;
u64 aux_size;
- /*
- * regs_user may point to task_pt_regs or to regs_user_copy, depending
- * on arch details.
- */
struct perf_regs regs_user;
- struct pt_regs regs_user_copy;
-
struct perf_regs regs_intr;
u64 stack_user_size;
--- a/include/linux/perf_regs.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_regs.h
@@ -20,8 +20,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs,
int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask);
u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task);
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy);
+ struct pt_regs *regs);
#else
#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
@@ -42,8 +41,7 @@ static inline u64 perf_reg_abi(struct ta
}
static inline void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs);
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6374,14 +6374,13 @@ perf_output_sample_regs(struct perf_outp
}
static void perf_sample_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
if (user_mode(regs)) {
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
regs_user->regs = regs;
} else if (!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
- perf_get_regs_user(regs_user, regs, regs_user_copy);
+ perf_get_regs_user(regs_user, regs);
} else {
regs_user->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE;
regs_user->regs = NULL;
@@ -7083,8 +7082,7 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_eve
}
if (sample_type & (PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER | PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER))
- perf_sample_regs_user(&data->regs_user, regs,
- &data->regs_user_copy);
+ perf_sample_regs_user(&data->regs_user, regs);
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER) {
/* regs dump ABI info */
next prev parent reply index
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-30 15:13 [PATCH 0/6] perf: Reduce stack usage (and misc bits) Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 15:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf: Reduce stack usage of perf_output_begin() Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-10 12:45 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 15:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf/x86: Reduce stack usage for x86_pmu::drain_pebs() Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-10 12:45 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 15:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf: Fix get_recursion_context() Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-10 12:45 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 15:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf: Optimize get_recursion_context() Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 17:11 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-30 20:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-10-30 22:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-30 23:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-10-31 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 23:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-31 12:11 ` David Laight
2020-10-31 13:18 ` David Laight
2020-11-09 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-09 14:14 ` David Laight
2020-11-10 12:45 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-11-10 12:45 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf/arch: Remove perf_sample_data::regs_user_copy tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 15:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf/x86: Make dummy_iregs static Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-10 12:45 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201030151955.258178461@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
Archives are clonable:
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8 lkml/git/8.git
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9 lkml/git/9.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
public-inbox-index lkml
Example config snippet for mirrors
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git