From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAFAC4741F for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 23:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3010206A4 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 23:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eNEVhVKu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727567AbgKAX4D (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:56:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727119AbgKAX4D (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:56:03 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x643.google.com (mail-ej1-x643.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::643]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22515C0617A6; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 15:56:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x643.google.com with SMTP id p5so16535688ejj.2; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 15:56:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=hxNCmXN+Np0a9fyk4jNL6uxWJrRHqB5tuMS990NxiFA=; b=eNEVhVKuq4LSWiX81LodotFKxhiO06l0LHgrGgBSCmI3o/660wqAWCLwj7vASYoTO0 mqYrxuGAsnr2iIHSWFGeNpZ4xhJdcN7CWJ0zbhi4NSOJX1wNwrv6rChNizGdaLr/z++9 y8isFlTl3AhvW/kcvpgsanwttUSXhfWzJOSxhu3N0MYHvfn5OV+ARLgov4UTOOLZFApJ MIVniKopBmGpvlbvKooUvMvZwjemXDaL2bh9edZP5QLlne1HfNCCNe841DKRg14FmFYr eqbT3g4pTmb2unORLo1CAirM8saJg+EzmFryZqKxXnWiqorHi8XF69IGRjgmn5Ihpqhh D36w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=hxNCmXN+Np0a9fyk4jNL6uxWJrRHqB5tuMS990NxiFA=; b=WxqXyRvNVVHcCth1AgQdxKQfHdOvhnoFGKBJMOK5aeguEz3wfVcL62BT2g8A2o0OXU kNFNaTUz0iMSVH+N8McXYlMJj4I0AJmKy4X6j4HGsyU9ALTsdN0J8oxhsevy77I4a2EG o94Ax9Sqjde9FH1K5j+9zrTLNsrEdnoJY4YYyLq7O6TSIIRP0pwduwroWrDrkBk+PqoZ X2j2Ro2pxoie986Or70XyMBzcxMLzUK30jNXKEl37MB6cwsHVCTiffDaMZ96mKJjq8fO sOKokBWl+9Hw5w0wvN1An/WRxKRdRmRoUCXgraIXEXK/wqPfFexUBT2fznU05gNFyNVX Si1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329s+DaTzSscbPsrgfonqTETPoZvGKgFEUOIfKf/OJWIJOErvkD QywsFfqz8BOosCieSw0v8rE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwEYitE1WK+4CHeQD3modQC6TZN69oVu0YWKz1Ht+dHeo8jkIBZ3fFK4SnCLj2PDdrjiLMuUw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3413:: with SMTP id c19mr12512644ejb.421.1604274961855; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 15:56:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.2.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k22sm9425259edr.12.2020.11.01.15.56.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 01 Nov 2020 15:56:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 01:55:59 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Christian Eggers Cc: Richard Cochran , Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Jakub Kicinski , Rob Herring , Helmut Grohne , Paul Barker , Codrin Ciubotariu , George McCollister , Marek Vasut , Tristram Ha , "David S . Miller" , Woojung Huh , Microchip Linux Driver Support , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 7/9] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: add hardware time stamping support Message-ID: <20201101235559.wcdns4kmy6ri7kmz@skbuf> References: <20201019172435.4416-1-ceggers@arri.de> <4928494.XgmExmOR0V@n95hx1g2> <20201101111008.vl4lj4iqmqjdpbyg@skbuf> <3355013.oZEI4y40TO@n95hx1g2> <20201101234149.rrhrjiyt7l4orkm7@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201101234149.rrhrjiyt7l4orkm7@skbuf> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 01:41:49AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > In principle I don't see any reason why this switch would not be able > to operate as a one-step peer delay BC. What I meant to say was "one-step E2E BC", since I was talking about having to receive both Sync and Delay_Req at the same time, of course.