From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.10-rc2-rt4
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:19:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201104111948.vpykh3ptmysqhmve@beryllium.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104104617.ueefmpdou4t3t2ce@linutronix.de>
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:46:17AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> How reproducible are these numbers? If these numbers increase between
> rt3 and rt4 then we have a hand full patches to look at.
Usually signaltest generated reproducible results.
I did see those higher numbers also for v5.10-rc1-rt1 (forgot to post
those). For arm64 the max latency was even higher, around 450us. But I
don't have a lot of data so I wouldn't jump to any conclusion.
> just like that?
Yes, Just fired up signaltest 5 times for arm64 and x86_64 with the
latest release. Keep you posted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-04 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 19:57 [ANNOUNCE] v5.10-rc2-rt4 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-11-04 10:38 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-11-04 10:46 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-11-04 11:19 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2020-11-04 12:47 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-11-04 13:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-11-04 16:06 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-11-06 10:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-11-06 16:14 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-11-09 12:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-11-09 14:37 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-11-09 16:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-11-11 18:39 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-11-10 18:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-11-12 12:39 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-11-12 13:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201104111948.vpykh3ptmysqhmve@beryllium.lan \
--to=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).