From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A876C4741F for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157F8206DB for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730799AbgKEM4s (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 07:56:48 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:60002 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730594AbgKEM4p (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 07:56:45 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43AB6142F; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 04:56:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from e108754-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e108754-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.198.32]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0F4DB3F719; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 04:56:42 -0800 (PST) From: Ionela Voinescu To: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com, jeremy.linton@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ionela.voinescu@arm.com Subject: [PATCH 3/8] cppc_cpufreq: simplify use of performance capabilities Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:55:19 +0000 Message-Id: <20201105125524.4409-4-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20201105125524.4409-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> References: <20201105125524.4409-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The CPPC performance capabilities are used significantly throughout the driver. Simplify the use of them by introducing a local pointer "caps" to point to cpu_data->perf_caps, in functions that access performance capabilities often. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index 317169453549..7cc9bd8568de 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -183,15 +183,16 @@ static int cppc_verify_policy(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy) static void cppc_cpufreq_stop_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; + struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps; unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; int ret; - cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = cpu_data->perf_caps.lowest_perf; + cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = caps->lowest_perf; ret = cppc_set_perf(cpu, &cpu_data->perf_ctrls); if (ret) pr_debug("Err setting perf value:%d on CPU:%d. ret:%d\n", - cpu_data->perf_caps.lowest_perf, cpu, ret); + caps->lowest_perf, cpu, ret); } /* @@ -240,11 +241,12 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_transition_delay_us(unsigned int cpu) static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; + struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps; unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; int ret = 0; cpu_data->cpu = cpu; - ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(cpu, &cpu_data->perf_caps); + ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(cpu, caps); if (ret) { pr_debug("Err reading CPU%d perf capabilities. ret:%d\n", @@ -253,23 +255,27 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) } /* Convert the lowest and nominal freq from MHz to KHz */ - cpu_data->perf_caps.lowest_freq *= 1000; - cpu_data->perf_caps.nominal_freq *= 1000; + caps->lowest_freq *= 1000; + caps->nominal_freq *= 1000; /* * Set min to lowest nonlinear perf to avoid any efficiency penalty (see * Section 8.4.7.1.1.5 of ACPI 6.1 spec) */ - policy->min = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, cpu_data->perf_caps.lowest_nonlinear_perf); - policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, cpu_data->perf_caps.nominal_perf); + policy->min = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, + caps->lowest_nonlinear_perf); + policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, + caps->nominal_perf); /* * Set cpuinfo.min_freq to Lowest to make the full range of performance * available if userspace wants to use any perf between lowest & lowest * nonlinear perf */ - policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, cpu_data->perf_caps.lowest_perf); - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, cpu_data->perf_caps.nominal_perf); + policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, + caps->lowest_perf); + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, + caps->nominal_perf); policy->transition_delay_us = cppc_cpufreq_get_transition_delay_us(cpu); policy->shared_type = cpu_data->shared_type; @@ -283,7 +289,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (unlikely(i == cpu)) continue; - memcpy(&all_cpu_data[i]->perf_caps, &cpu_data->perf_caps, + memcpy(&all_cpu_data[i]->perf_caps, caps, sizeof(cpu_data->perf_caps)); } } else if (policy->shared_type == CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL) { @@ -298,18 +304,17 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) * If 'highest_perf' is greater than 'nominal_perf', we assume CPU Boost * is supported. */ - if (cpu_data->perf_caps.highest_perf > cpu_data->perf_caps.nominal_perf) + if (caps->highest_perf > caps->nominal_perf) boost_supported = true; /* Set policy->cur to max now. The governors will adjust later. */ - policy->cur = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, - cpu_data->perf_caps.highest_perf); - cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = cpu_data->perf_caps.highest_perf; + policy->cur = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, caps->highest_perf); + cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = caps->highest_perf; ret = cppc_set_perf(cpu, &cpu_data->perf_ctrls); if (ret) pr_debug("Err setting perf value:%d on CPU:%d. ret:%d\n", - cpu_data->perf_caps.highest_perf, cpu, ret); + caps->highest_perf, cpu, ret); return ret; } @@ -368,6 +373,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) static int cppc_cpufreq_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state) { struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; + struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps; int ret; if (!boost_supported) { @@ -377,10 +383,10 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state) if (state) policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, - cpu_data->perf_caps.highest_perf); + caps->highest_perf); else policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, - cpu_data->perf_caps.nominal_perf); + caps->nominal_perf); policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max; ret = freq_qos_update_request(policy->max_freq_req, policy->max); -- 2.17.1