From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E122C388F7 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 00:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD76920759 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 00:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="oy5kilDA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732792AbgKFAjt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 19:39:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55380 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731965AbgKFAjt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 19:39:49 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C064C0613CF; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:39:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0ee50005b6d9c42d515134.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0e:e500:5b6:d9c4:2d51:5134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 7EFA51EC03C1; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 01:39:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1604623186; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=0szqA5V2pWQy1oA4esAc8Cd/+uPXvX7U+GvP5QW9eG0=; b=oy5kilDAaqW8D3fJeTgJuW3QylXyiVe5HYjaX0XPPDCel+XUQwGXzH6wjm1AGlYfxIs5no r4thFzHBCwhuHfpUfJa8XlGpAJRL7uq6QBovCno2DKVA2DD8a7HNrXRmIgMXeulu5FcMn0 0235BOZ4bTQdtucU9xbEAGyFarjyBdQ= Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 01:39:32 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Michael Roth Cc: Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, Juergen Gross , Tom Lendacky , Joerg Roedel , Mike Stunes , Kees Cook , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Cfir Cohen , Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Martin Radev , Masami Hiramatsu , Andy Lutomirski , hpa@zytor.com, Erdem Aktas , David Rientjes , Dan Williams , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/72] KVM: SVM: nested: Don't allocate VMCB structures on stack Message-ID: <20201106003932.GQ25636@zn.tnic> References: <20200907131613.12703-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20200907131613.12703-2-joro@8bytes.org> <160459347763.31546.3911053208379939674@vm0> <20201105163812.GE25636@zn.tnic> <20201106003153.wrr7zvjjl3hl2pec@vm0> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201106003153.wrr7zvjjl3hl2pec@vm0> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 06:31:53PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote: > I can confirm that patch fixes the issue. It is indeed a 5.9.1 tree, but > looks like the SEV-ES patches didn't go in until v5.10-rc1 Yes, they went into 5.10-rc1 during the merge window. > (this tree had a backport of them), so stable trees shouldn't be > affected. Ah, ok, that makes sense. Thanks for checking! -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette