From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25413C388F2 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAB520674 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726502AbgKFHz7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 02:55:59 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:50436 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725830AbgKFHz6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 02:55:58 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id AA44B68B02; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:55:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:55:54 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ralph Campbell Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Glisse , John Hubbard , Alistair Popple , Christoph Hellwig , Jason Gunthorpe , Bharata B Rao , Zi Yan , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Yang Shi , Ben Skeggs , Shuah Khan , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] mm/thp: add prep_transhuge_device_private_page() Message-ID: <20201106075554.GA31341@lst.de> References: <20201106005147.20113-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com> <20201106005147.20113-2-rcampbell@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201106005147.20113-2-rcampbell@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 04:51:42PM -0800, Ralph Campbell wrote: > +extern void prep_transhuge_device_private_page(struct page *page); No need for the extern. > +static inline void prep_transhuge_device_private_page(struct page *page) > +{ > +} Is the code to call this even reachable if THP support is configured out? If not just declaring it unconditionally and letting dead code elimination do its job might be a tad cleaner. > +void prep_transhuge_device_private_page(struct page *page) I think a kerneldoc comment explaining what this function is useful for would be helpful.