From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6221C4741F for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D1A2078B for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727471AbgKFOjB (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:39:01 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34078 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726565AbgKFOjA (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:39:00 -0500 Received: from gaia (unknown [2.26.170.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FDFC208B3; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:38:55 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Sudarshan Rajagopalan Cc: Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gavin Shan , Anshuman Khandual , Mark Rutland , Logan Gunthorpe , David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , Steven Price Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64/mm: add fallback option to allocate virtually contiguous memory Message-ID: <20201106143854.GH29329@gaia> References: <4ca1e695f81b368a5487bdaa9b421a95@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ca1e695f81b368a5487bdaa9b421a95@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 04:03:36PM -0800, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote: > Did you have a chance to review this patch? It is reviewed by others and > haven't seen any Nacks. This patch will be useful to have so that memory > hotremove doesn't fail when such PMD_SIZE pages aren't available.. which is > usually the case in low RAM devices. Can you please post it again please with Will's ack? You posted a v4 which I think had the same message-id as v3. Mutt flagged it as duplicate and I deleted it. Just to be sure (I'll queue it when we get to -rc3). Thanks. -- Catalin