From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D008C388F9 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF172087E for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:04:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604700254; bh=ieDhYU4bSFd1/vVWlPxscTeA4K/tr1v7M3g5bfv6eOo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=NoR0+SmYTUIJv6be5cdsDaYCy6DRUsN9ZHhZfCRjgGdvcokhYw0yfkqG2OlmRTKLD 5xOIE7/4V58q9QHofzYTaSOx+lAJEmFycozeeJ++Roo2neiSaGy89cowim89iarbPD dE7mg2MpfDMl7Eu0x5NfeotxB6BqhHHzge/11XqI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728824AbgKFWEO (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:04:14 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36136 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728558AbgKFWEN (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:04:13 -0500 Received: from kernel.org (83-245-197-237.elisa-laajakaista.fi [83.245.197.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 375B32065D; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:04:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604700252; bh=ieDhYU4bSFd1/vVWlPxscTeA4K/tr1v7M3g5bfv6eOo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=I3qy6PVFwmL7t7ItZ7VRZfBLNSepfCPtzAw1UdebRyLjkuKrqI84qS51zrxMieQYb BBdeSxUFMI5MbEIqGOgMvDF5ON3hh2f60/XQDIj9qsa2oc+Inl8lhNltULv7H33Zf5 walgx0begp0qp2lSHjRfutm56RG9xohfH44GJgh8= Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 00:04:02 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Mel Gorman , Jarkko Sakkinen , x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox , Jethro Beekman , Darren Kenny , andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, asapek@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com, chenalexchen@google.com, conradparker@google.com, cyhanish@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com, kai.svahn@intel.com, kmoy@google.com, ludloff@google.com, luto@kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yaozhangx@google.com, mikko.ylinen@intel.com, Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [PATCH v40 10/24] mm: Add 'mprotect' hook to struct vm_operations_struct Message-ID: <20201106220402.GB55146@kernel.org> References: <20201104145430.300542-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20201104145430.300542-11-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20201106100409.GD3371@techsingularity.net> <20201106165107.GA52595@kernel.org> <20201106203725.GK14914@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201106203725.GK14914@zn.tnic> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:37:25PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 06:51:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Both comments make sense to me. I'll refine this patch on Monday and > > And while you're at it, I'd suggest you refine the whole patchset and > send a full v41 instead: > > - please audit all your Reviewed-by, Acked-by tags as to for what > versions of the patches they were given. If you've changed those patches > in the meantime, then all those tags are invalid and need to go. > > - work in all the change requests > > - fix the order of the patches so that each one builds > > so that they can be taken cleanly into tip. > > Thx. OK, everything else is clear except change requests part I want to check. There has been a change request to update callback that made perfect sense to me. Is there something else that I might have missed? Just checking. > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette /Jarkko