From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44882C4741F for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BC9206B2 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="SfZRnN4p" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729909AbgKJK0F (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2020 05:26:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50878 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726779AbgKJK0D (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2020 05:26:03 -0500 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4C05C0613CF; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:26:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nCQVGn4tgfLDgNzQCS32tBXcK/X7ubEDqdXouPvVcJQ=; b=SfZRnN4p1ttAS8Ghlm9p0xu6h vOansbt/QrOwwa2epSnjVphHCTBz2m2ii+gO4lHwL8icwhH8RjS2rEtcNSjLgsFj1hLwoj9O9EcoN E4Q1bU4G26fSx6Qaz//mMWSeP8wwsy32S4ixki0ubfQHm54pu86DKaCL+DqMAglMlv0wcz5U/Incd 2Q9HvuJjz5Paka+4JIQTK2277apFwyUkPbIbeCkq1ZaGCBeuDuN9RuHJhgxjZJpdPiZEQX462Hwbs zzK6AJunlQEl4KpNFWY8Iy2mslIfXXwwrcEmNp0B9J4EXL9lyKMzG4Qx5PBhcIp3heKSjbyzHpkuj E60Hv1iMw==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:57904) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcQqY-0000uh-SW; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:25:54 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcQqX-0001ND-70; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:25:53 +0000 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:25:53 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Bjarni Jonasson Cc: Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: phylink: Fix CuSFP issue in phylink Message-ID: <20201110102552.GZ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20201110100642.2153-1-bjarni.jonasson@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201110100642.2153-1-bjarni.jonasson@microchip.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:06:42AM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote: > There is an issue with the current phylink driver and CuSFPs which > results in a callback to the phylink validate function without any > advertisement capabilities. The workaround (in this changeset) > is to assign capabilities if a 1000baseT SFP is identified. How does this happen? Which PHY is being used? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!