From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FD8C2D0E4 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A8121D7F for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AF+L0XCv" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726308AbgKMBxE (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:53:04 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47646 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725972AbgKMBxD (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:53:03 -0500 Received: from kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com (unknown [163.114.132.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7304820791; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:53:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1605232383; bh=DjyNIg5N1WPSkeeifOBONgzsegthHILogdziWb/Oj0g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AF+L0XCv+yA+89tbNvn+RldVj7wJvFdmb4UIMs7SZ1L6Rgr9TBc3xPamdp04iXiBn ci3gye+hhJcpbC4y3cARIbDIJy9B2YaxCcVdzrb/bPg/K9Lk00+6D/UPLozPsPDq3a tsY70xiRShN7UBTntdo1e/N8f/UVLGAq9WBKwa24= Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:53:01 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Dave Hansen Cc: kernel test robot , Dmytro Shytyi , kuznet , yoshfuji , liuhangbin , davem , netdev , linux-kernel , kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO Message-ID: <20201112175301.481f80c2@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <8b05710f-5718-986d-659c-916e2b85c892@intel.com> References: <175b3433a4c.aea7c06513321.4158329434310691736@shytyi.net> <202011110944.7zNVZmvB-lkp@intel.com> <20201112162423.6b4de8d1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <8b05710f-5718-986d-659c-916e2b85c892@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:43:56 -0800 Dave Hansen wrote: > On 11/12/20 4:24 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote: =20 > >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > >> Reported-by: kernel test robot =20 > > Good people of kernel test robot, could you please rephrase this to say > > that the tag is only appropriate if someone is sending a fix up/follow > > up patch? > >=20 > > Folks keep adding those tags on the next revisions of the their patches > > which is quite misleading. =20 >=20 > I think it's still fair for the lkp folks to get *some* credit for > reporting these bugs.=C2=A0 I mean, the stated reason[1] for it existing = is: >=20 > The Reported-by tag gives credit to people who find bugs and > report them and it hopefully inspires them to help us again in > the future. >=20 > I do agree, though, that it's confusing *what* they reported, especially > if the patch in question is fixing something *else*. Rather than invent > a new tag, maybe a comment would suffice: >=20 > Reported-by: kernel test robot # bug in earlier revision Fine by me, although its not common to add Reported-by tags for people who point out issues in review, so why add a tag for the bot?