From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me>, Amit Shah <amit@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH virtio] virtio: virtio_console: fix DMA memory allocation for rproc serial
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:39:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116163907.GA19209@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116162844.GB16619@infradead.org>
Btw, I also still don't understand why remoteproc is using
dma_declare_coherent_memory to start with. The virtio code has exactly
one call to dma_alloc_coherent vring_alloc_queue, a function that
already switches between two different allocators. Why can't we just
add a third allocator specifically for these remoteproc memory carveouts
and bypass dma_declare_coherent_memory entirely?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-16 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-04 15:31 [PATCH virtio] virtio: virtio_console: fix DMA memory allocation for rproc serial Alexander Lobakin
2020-11-04 18:21 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-05 3:10 ` Jason Wang
2020-11-05 12:22 ` Alexander Lobakin
2020-11-09 6:04 ` Jason Wang
2020-11-16 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-16 9:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-11-16 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-16 16:43 ` Alexander Lobakin
2020-11-16 10:46 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-11-16 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-16 16:39 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-11-17 14:00 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-11-17 14:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 10:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-11-16 12:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-11-16 13:07 ` Alexander Lobakin
2020-11-16 13:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-11-16 16:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201116163907.GA19209@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=alobakin@pm.me \
--cc=amit@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).