linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"Kelley, Sean V" <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] cxl/acpi: add OSC support
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:59:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116175909.00007e53@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201111054356.793390-3-ben.widawsky@intel.com>

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:43:49 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:

> From: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> 
> Add support to advertise OS capabilities, and request OS control for CXL
> features using the ACPI _OSC mechanism. Advertise support for all
> possible CXL features, and attempt to request control too for all
> possible features.
> 
> Based on a patch by Sean Kelley.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>

I guess unsurprisingly a lot of this is cut and paste from PCIe
so can we share some of the code?

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> ---
> 
> This uses a non-standard UUID for CXL and is meant as a change proposal
> to the CXL specification. The definition for _OSC intermixes PCIe and
> CXL Dwords, which makes a clean separation of CXL capabilities
> difficult, if not impossible. This is therefore subject to change.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 210 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/cxl/acpi.h |  18 ++++
>  2 files changed, 226 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> index 26e4f73838a7..c3e2f7f6ea02 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,16 @@
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include "acpi.h"
>  
> +/*
> + * TODO: These are global for now to save the OSC state.
> + * This works if OSC can be expected to be uniform for every ACPI0016 object.
> + * If that is not the case, revisit this. These need to be saved because
> + * relinquishing control of a previously granted capability is disallowed.
> + */
> +static u32 cxl_osc_support_set;
> +static u32 cxl_osc_control_set;
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_desc_lock);
> +
>  static void acpi_cxl_desc_init(struct acpi_cxl_desc *acpi_desc, struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	dev_set_drvdata(dev, acpi_desc);
> @@ -74,6 +84,199 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_cxl_driver = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> +struct pci_osc_bit_struct {
> +	u32 bit;
> +	char *desc;
> +};
> +
> +static struct pci_osc_bit_struct cxl_osc_support_bit[] = {
> +	{ CXL_OSC_PORT_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT, "CXLPortRegAccess" },
> +	{ CXL_OSC_PORT_DEV_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT, "CXLPortDevRegAccess" },
> +	{ CXL_OSC_PER_SUPPORT, "CXLProtocolErrorReporting" },
> +	{ CXL_OSC_NATIVE_HP_SUPPORT, "CXLNativeHotPlug" },
> +};
> +
> +static struct pci_osc_bit_struct cxl_osc_control_bit[] = {
> +	{ CXL_OSC_MEM_ERROR_CONTROL, "CXLMemErrorReporting" },
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * CXL 2.0 spec UUID - unusable as it PCI and CXL OSC are mixed
> + * static u8 cxl_osc_uuid_str[] = "68F2D50B-C469-4d8A-BD3D-941A103FD3FC";
> + */
> +/* New, proposed UUID for CXL-only OSC */
> +static u8 cxl_osc_uuid_str[] = "A4D1629D-FF52-4888-BE96-E5CADE548DB1";
> +
> +static void decode_osc_bits(struct device *dev, char *msg, u32 word,
> +			    struct pci_osc_bit_struct *table, int size)
> +{
> +	char buf[80];
> +	int i, len = 0;
> +	struct pci_osc_bit_struct *entry;
> +
> +	buf[0] = '\0';
> +	for (i = 0, entry = table; i < size; i++, entry++)
> +		if (word & entry->bit)
> +			len += scnprintf(buf + len, sizeof(buf) - len, "%s%s",
> +					len ? " " : "", entry->desc);
> +
> +	dev_info(dev, "_OSC: %s [%s]\n", msg, buf);

Can we look at sharing code with PCI?

> +}
> +
> +static void decode_cxl_osc_support(struct device *dev, char *msg, u32 word)
> +{
> +	decode_osc_bits(dev, msg, word, cxl_osc_support_bit,
> +			ARRAY_SIZE(cxl_osc_support_bit));
> +}
> +
> +static void decode_cxl_osc_control(struct device *dev, char *msg, u32 word)
> +{
> +	decode_osc_bits(dev, msg, word, cxl_osc_control_bit,
> +			ARRAY_SIZE(cxl_osc_control_bit));
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_status acpi_cap_run_osc(acpi_handle handle,
> +				    const u32 *capbuf, u8 *uuid_str, u32 *retval)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_osc_context context = {
> +		.uuid_str = uuid_str,
> +		.rev = 1,
> +		.cap.length = 20,
> +		.cap.pointer = (void *)capbuf,
> +	};
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	status = acpi_run_osc(handle, &context);
> +	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> +		*retval = *((u32 *)(context.ret.pointer + 8));
> +		kfree(context.ret.pointer);
> +	}
> +	return status;
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_status cxl_query_osc(acpi_handle handle, u32 support, u32 *control)
> +{
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	u32 result, capbuf[5];
> +
> +	support &= CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_VALID_MASK;
> +	support |= cxl_osc_support_set;
> +
> +	capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = OSC_QUERY_ENABLE;
> +	capbuf[CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = support;
> +	if (control) {
> +		*control &= CXL_OSC_CONTROL_VALID_MASK;
> +		capbuf[CXL_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | cxl_osc_control_set;
> +	} else {
> +		/* Run _OSC query only with existing controls. */
> +		capbuf[CXL_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = cxl_osc_control_set;
> +	}
> +
> +	status = acpi_cap_run_osc(handle, capbuf, cxl_osc_uuid_str, &result);
> +	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> +		cxl_osc_support_set = support;
> +		if (control)
> +			*control = result;
> +	}
> +	return status;
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_status cxl_osc_advertise_support(acpi_handle handle, u32 flags)
> +{
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&acpi_desc_lock);
> +	status = cxl_query_osc(handle, flags, NULL);
> +	mutex_unlock(&acpi_desc_lock);
> +	return status;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cxl_osc_request_control - Request control of CXL root _OSC features.
> + * @adev: ACPI device for the PCI root bridge (or PCIe Root Complex).
> + * @mask: Mask of _OSC bits to request control of, place to store control mask.
> + * @req: Mask of _OSC bits the control of is essential to the caller.
> + **/
> +static acpi_status cxl_osc_request_control(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 *mask, u32 req)
> +{
> +	acpi_handle handle = adev->handle;
> +	struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
> +	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> +	u32 ctrl, capbuf[5];
> +
> +	if (!mask)
> +		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
> +
> +	ctrl = *mask & CXL_OSC_MEM_ERROR_CONTROL;
> +	if ((ctrl & req) != req)
> +		return AE_TYPE;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&acpi_desc_lock);
> +
> +	*mask = ctrl | cxl_osc_control_set;
> +	/* No need to evaluate _OSC if the control was already granted. */
> +	if ((cxl_osc_control_set & ctrl) == ctrl)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/* Need to check the available controls bits before requesting them. */
> +	while (*mask) {
> +		status = cxl_query_osc(handle, cxl_osc_support_set, mask);
> +		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +			goto out;
> +		if (ctrl == *mask)
> +			break;
> +		decode_cxl_osc_control(dev, "platform does not support", ctrl & ~(*mask));
> +		ctrl = *mask;
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((ctrl & req) != req) {
> +		decode_cxl_osc_control(dev, "not requesting control; platform does not support",
> +				       req & ~(ctrl));
> +		status = AE_SUPPORT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = 0;
> +	capbuf[CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = cxl_osc_support_set;
> +	capbuf[CXL_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = ctrl;
> +	status = acpi_cap_run_osc(handle, capbuf, cxl_osc_uuid_str, mask);
> +	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> +		cxl_osc_control_set = *mask;
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&acpi_desc_lock);
> +	return status;
> +}
> +
> +static int cxl_negotiate_osc(struct acpi_device *adev)
> +{
> +	u32 cxl_support, cxl_control, requested;
> +	acpi_handle handle = adev->handle;
> +	struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	/* Declare support for everything */
> +	cxl_support = CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_VALID_MASK;
> +	decode_cxl_osc_support(dev, "OS supports", cxl_support);
> +	status = cxl_osc_advertise_support(handle, cxl_support);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		dev_info(dev, "CXL_OSC failed (%s)\n", acpi_format_exception(status));
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Request control for everything */
> +	cxl_control = CXL_OSC_CONTROL_VALID_MASK;
> +	requested = cxl_control;
> +	status = cxl_osc_request_control(adev, &cxl_control, CXL_OSC_MEM_ERROR_CONTROL);
> +	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> +		decode_cxl_osc_control(dev, "OS now controls", cxl_control);
> +	} else {
> +		decode_cxl_osc_control(dev, "OS requested", requested);
> +		decode_cxl_osc_control(dev, "platform willing to grant", cxl_control);
> +		dev_info(dev, "_OSC failed (%s)\n", acpi_format_exception(status));
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * If/when CXL support is defined by other platform firmware the kernel
>   * will need a mechanism to select between the platform specific version
> @@ -84,6 +287,7 @@ int cxl_bus_prepared(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	struct acpi_device *adev;
>  	struct pci_dev *root_port;
>  	struct device *root;
> +	int rc;
>  
>  	root_port = pcie_find_root_port(pdev);
>  	if (!root_port)
> @@ -97,9 +301,11 @@ int cxl_bus_prepared(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	if (!adev)
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
> -	/* TODO: OSC enabling */
> +	rc = cxl_negotiate_osc(adev);
> +	if (rc)
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to negotiate OSC\n");
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return rc;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cxl_bus_prepared);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.h b/drivers/cxl/acpi.h
> index 011505475cc6..bf8d078e1b2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,24 @@ struct acpi_cxl_desc {
>  	struct device *dev;
>  };
>  
> +/* Indexes into _OSC Capabilities Buffer */
> +#define CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD			1	/* DWORD 2 */
> +#define CXL_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD			2	/* DWORD 3 */
> +
> +/* CXL Host Bridge _OSC: Capabilities DWORD 2: Support Field */
> +#define CXL_OSC_PORT_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT		0x00000001
> +#define CXL_OSC_PORT_DEV_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT	0x00000002
> +#define CXL_OSC_PER_SUPPORT			0x00000004
> +#define CXL_OSC_NATIVE_HP_SUPPORT		0x00000008
> +#define CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_VALID_MASK		(CXL_OSC_PORT_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT |	\
> +						 CXL_OSC_PORT_DEV_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT |	\
> +						 CXL_OSC_PER_SUPPORT |			\
> +						 CXL_OSC_NATIVE_HP_SUPPORT)
> +
> +/* CXL Host Bridge _OSC: Capabilities DWORD 3: Control Field */
> +#define CXL_OSC_MEM_ERROR_CONTROL		0x00000001
> +#define CXL_OSC_CONTROL_VALID_MASK		(CXL_OSC_MEM_ERROR_CONTROL)
> +
>  int cxl_bus_prepared(struct pci_dev *pci_dev);
>  
>  #endif	/* __CXL_ACPI_H__ */


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-16 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-11  5:43 [RFC PATCH 0/9] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] cxl/acpi: Add an acpi_cxl module for the CXL interconnect Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  6:17   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-11  7:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-11  7:30     ` Verma, Vishal L
2020-11-11  7:34       ` hch
2020-11-11  7:36         ` Verma, Vishal L
2020-11-11 23:03   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-16 17:59   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 18:23     ` Verma, Vishal L
2020-11-17 14:32   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-17 21:45     ` Dan Williams
2020-11-18 11:14       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] cxl/acpi: add OSC support Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 17:59   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-11-16 23:25     ` Dan Williams
2020-11-18 12:25       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-18 17:58         ` Dan Williams
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] cxl/mem: Add a driver for the type-3 mailbox Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  6:17   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-11  7:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-11 17:17     ` Dan Williams
2020-11-11 18:27       ` Dan Williams
2020-11-11 21:41       ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-11 22:40         ` Dan Williams
2020-11-16 16:56       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-13 18:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-14  1:08     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-15  0:23       ` Dan Williams
2020-11-17 14:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-04  7:22     ` Dan Williams
2020-12-04  7:27       ` Dan Williams
2020-12-04 17:39         ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] cxl/mem: Map memory device registers Ben Widawsky
2020-11-13 18:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-14  1:12     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 23:19       ` Dan Williams
2020-11-17  0:23         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-23 19:20           ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-23 19:32             ` Dan Williams
2020-11-23 19:58               ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 15:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] cxl/mem: Find device capabilities Ben Widawsky
2020-11-13 18:26   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-14  1:36     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 15:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-24  0:17     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-26  6:05   ` Jon Masters
2020-11-26 18:18     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-04  7:35     ` Dan Williams
2020-12-04  7:41   ` Dan Williams
2020-12-07  6:12     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] cxl/mem: Initialize the mailbox interface Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 15:22   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] cxl/mem: Implement polled mode mailbox Ben Widawsky
2020-11-13 23:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-17 15:31   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-17 16:34     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 18:06       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-17 18:38         ` Dan Williams
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 15:56   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-20  2:16     ` Dan Williams
2020-11-20 15:20       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainers of the CXL driver Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11 22:06 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11 22:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201116175909.00007e53@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).