From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392D2C5519F for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D862524656 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725834AbgKQTEp (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:04:45 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:35138 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725446AbgKQTEo (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:04:44 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E95101E; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:04:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.1.198.32]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 976FC3F718; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:04:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:04:42 +0000 From: Ionela Voinescu To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Len Brown , Sudeep Holla , Morten Rasmussen , Jeremy Linton , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] cppc_cpufreq: fix, clarify and improve support Message-ID: <20201117190442.GA25835@arm.com> References: <20201105125524.4409-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> <20201117153241.GA730@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 17 Nov 2020 at 17:30:33 (+0100), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [..] > > > > Ionela Voinescu (8): > > > > cppc_cpufreq: fix misspelling, code style and readability issues > > > > cppc_cpufreq: clean up cpu, cpu_num and cpunum variable use > > > > cppc_cpufreq: simplify use of performance capabilities > > > > cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu structures with lists > > > > cppc_cpufreq: use policy->cpu as driver of frequency setting > > > > cppc_cpufreq: clarify support for coordination types > > > > cppc_cpufreq: expose information on frequency domains > > > > acpi: fix NONE coordination for domain mapping failure > > > > > > > > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 3 +- > > > > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 126 +++--- > > > > drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 2 +- > > > > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 358 +++++++++++------- > > > > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 14 +- > > > > 5 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 226 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > All patches applied as 5.11 material (with a minor subject edit in the > > > last patch), thanks! > > > > > > > Patch 4/8 was not acked. I was about to push a new version in which I > > fix the scenario that Jeremy mentioned. > > Well, it wasn't clear to me what you wanted to do about it. > Sorry about the confusion. > > Would you like me to push that > > as a separate patch on top of this series, > > Yes, please. Sent at: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201117184920.17036-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com/ Thank you, Ionela.