From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: "Ayyathurai, Vijayakannan" <vijayakannan.ayyathurai@intel.com>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"kbuild-all@lists.01.org" <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>,
lkp <lkp@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Lai, Poey Seng" <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>,
"linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pwm: keembay: Fix build failure with -Os
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:01:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201118180122.GD3552669@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB42509471531D8F009DB37E98FBE10@DM6PR11MB4250.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3124 bytes --]
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 05:41:57PM +0000, Ayyathurai, Vijayakannan wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pwm: keembay: Fix build failure with -Os
> >
> > [Cc: += linux-pwm which I forgot for the initial submission]
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:08:04AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > The driver used this construct:
> > >
> > > #define KMB_PWM_LEADIN_MASK GENMASK(30, 0)
> > >
> > > static inline void keembay_pwm_update_bits(struct keembay_pwm
> > *priv, u32 mask,
> > > u32 val, u32 offset)
> > > {
> > > u32 buff = readl(priv->base + offset);
> > >
> > > buff = u32_replace_bits(buff, val, mask);
> > > writel(buff, priv->base + offset);
> > > }
> > >
> > > ...
> > > keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_LEADIN_MASK, 0,
> > > KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(pwm-
> > >hwpwm));
> > >
> > > With CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE the compiler (here: gcc 10.2.0) this
> > > triggers:
> > >
> > > In file included from /home/uwe/gsrc/linux/drivers/pwm/pwm-
> > keembay.c:16:
> > > In function ‘field_multiplier’,
> > > inlined from ‘keembay_pwm_update_bits’ at
> > /home/uwe/gsrc/linux/include/linux/bitfield.h:124:17:
> > > /home/uwe/gsrc/linux/include/linux/bitfield.h:119:3: error: call to
> > ‘__bad_mask’ declared with attribute error: bad bitfield mask
> > > 119 | __bad_mask();
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In function ‘field_multiplier’,
> > > inlined from ‘keembay_pwm_update_bits’ at
> > /home/uwe/gsrc/linux/include/linux/bitfield.h:154:1:
> > > /home/uwe/gsrc/linux/include/linux/bitfield.h:119:3: error: call to
> > ‘__bad_mask’ declared with attribute error: bad bitfield mask
> > > 119 | __bad_mask();
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > > The compiler doesn't seem to be able to notice that with field being
> > > 0x3ffffff the expression
> > >
> > > if ((field | (field - 1)) & ((field | (field - 1)) + 1))
> > > __bad_mask();
> > >
> > > can be optimized away.
> > >
> > > So use __always_inline and document the problem in a comment to fix
> > > this.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure this is the right fix. Maybe the bitfield stuff can be
> > > changed somehow to make this problem go away, too?
> >
> > Note, this patch
> >
> > Fixes: cdbea243f419 ("pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay")
> >
> > so this isn't critical for v5.10.
> >
> > @thierry: If this is ok for you and Vijayakannan, you can squash this
> > into the original commit.
> >
>
> I am ok with Uwe approach.
> I have compiled the change and tested in Keembay board as well.
I'll take that as a Tested-by. Next time, if you go through the trouble
of testing a patch, make sure to reply with a:
Tested-by: Your Name <your@email.com>
So that patchwork can pick that up and credit you for it.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-18 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <202011160303.qi5aRChY-lkp@intel.com>
2020-11-16 9:08 ` [PATCH RFC] pwm: keembay: Fix build failure with -Os Uwe Kleine-König
2020-11-17 17:29 ` Ayyathurai, Vijayakannan
2020-11-18 9:48 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-11-18 10:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-11-18 17:41 ` Ayyathurai, Vijayakannan
2020-11-18 18:01 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2020-11-18 18:00 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201118180122.GD3552669@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=poey.seng.lai@intel.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vijayakannan.ayyathurai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).