From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150A6C5519F for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A90824692 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="Ao5RVkCy" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726105AbgKSDe4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:34:56 -0500 Received: from m42-4.mailgun.net ([69.72.42.4]:45997 "EHLO m42-4.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725767AbgKSDe4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:34:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1605756895; h=In-Reply-To: Content-Type: MIME-Version: References: Message-ID: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Sender; bh=9/FvVwv1JWEFZI/hwjzaXPcjx2+4ZSwGx1ijwtsSu2g=; b=Ao5RVkCyNCSKVykqZMfXEJGYibgqJmAeT10cg4G9yH76nlNann9F0Po6agiVKt5UePZflwHV g4CrV8b4pHDIexWaukL1wD/Udf9CfVx3AdPhRqvXyzBtj6YmPdCi3ZHbP3YFxNk9T6nkHU1W /d6YhdAajJU8Eafeux+SOYPV0nc= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.42.4 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n06.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 5fb5e7d5d64ea0b703a77808 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:34:45 GMT Sender: zhenhuah=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0A4B1C43460; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from codeaurora.org (unknown [180.166.53.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zhenhuah) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83E27C433C6; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:34:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 83E27C433C6 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=zhenhuah@codeaurora.org Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:34:32 +0800 From: Zhenhua Huang To: Minchan Kim Cc: vjitta@codeaurora.org, linux-mm , glider@google.com, Dan Williams , broonie@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Yogesh Lal , Vinayak Menon , tingwei@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: stackdepot: Add support to configure STACK_HASH_SIZE Message-ID: <20201119033317.GA5128@codeaurora.org> References: <1603372546-27118-1-git-send-email-vjitta@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:27:03AM +0800, Minchan Kim wrote: > Sorry if this mail corrupts the mail thread or had heavy mangling > since I lost this mail from my mailbox so I am sending this mail by > web gmail. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:18 AM wrote: > > > > From: Yogesh Lal > > > > Use STACK_HASH_ORDER_SHIFT to configure STACK_HASH_SIZE. > > > > Aim is to have configurable value for STACK_HASH_SIZE, > > so depend on use case one can configure it. > > > > One example is of Page Owner, default value of > > STACK_HASH_SIZE lead stack depot to consume 8MB of static memory. > > Making it configurable and use lower value helps to enable features like > > CONFIG_PAGE_OWNER without any significant overhead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yogesh Lal > > Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon > > Signed-off-by: Vijayanand Jitta > > --- > > lib/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++ > > lib/stackdepot.c | 3 +-- > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig > > index 18d76b6..b3f8259 100644 > > --- a/lib/Kconfig > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig > > @@ -651,6 +651,15 @@ config STACKDEPOT > > bool > > select STACKTRACE > > > > +config STACK_HASH_ORDER_SHIFT > > + int "stack depot hash size (12 => 4KB, 20 => 1024KB)" > > + range 12 20 > > + default 20 > > + depends on STACKDEPOT > > + help > > + Select the hash size as a power of 2 for the stackdepot hash > > table. > > + Choose a lower value to reduce the memory impact. > > + > > config SBITMAP > > bool > > > > diff --git a/lib/stackdepot.c b/lib/stackdepot.c > > index 2caffc6..413c20b 100644 > > --- a/lib/stackdepot.c > > +++ b/lib/stackdepot.c > > @@ -142,8 +142,7 @@ static struct stack_record *depot_alloc_stack(unsigned > > long *entries, int size, > > return stack; > > } > > > > -#define STACK_HASH_ORDER 20 > > -#define STACK_HASH_SIZE (1L << STACK_HASH_ORDER) > > +#define STACK_HASH_SIZE (1L << CONFIG_STACK_HASH_ORDER_SHIFT) > > #define STACK_HASH_MASK (STACK_HASH_SIZE - 1) > > #define STACK_HASH_SEED 0x9747b28c > > > > -- > > QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member > > of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation > > 2.7.4 > > > > 1. When we don't use page_owner, we don't want to waste any memory for > stackdepot hash array. > 2. When we use page_owner, we want to have reasonable stackdeport hash array > > With this configuration, it couldn't meet since we always need to > reserve a reasonable size for the array. > Can't we make the hash size as a kernel parameter? > With it, we could use it like this. > > 1. page_owner=off, stackdepot_stack_hash=0 -> no more wasted memory > when we don't use page_owner > 2. page_owner=on, stackdepot_stack_hash=8M -> reasonable hash size > when we use page_owner. Seems we have other users like kasan, and dma_buf_ref which we introduced. Also we can't guarantee there will not be any other users for stackdepot, so it's better we not depend on only page owner? > > > -- > Kind regards, > Minchan Kim >