linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:37:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201119173754.4125257-24-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119173754.4125257-1-guro@fb.com>

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 19 +------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index 2b8bbdbec872..eed12427ddd5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -443,7 +443,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	bool prealloc = !(attr->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
 	struct bpf_htab *htab;
 	int err, i;
-	u64 cost;
 
 	htab = kzalloc(sizeof(*htab), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!htab)
@@ -481,26 +480,12 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	    htab->n_buckets > U32_MAX / sizeof(struct bucket))
 		goto free_htab;
 
-	cost = (u64) htab->n_buckets * sizeof(struct bucket) +
-	       (u64) htab->elem_size * htab->map.max_entries;
-
-	if (percpu)
-		cost += (u64) round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8) *
-			num_possible_cpus() * htab->map.max_entries;
-	else
-	       cost += (u64) htab->elem_size * num_possible_cpus();
-
-	/* if map size is larger than memlock limit, reject it */
-	err = bpf_map_charge_init(&htab->map.memory, cost);
-	if (err)
-		goto free_htab;
-
 	err = -ENOMEM;
 	htab->buckets = bpf_map_area_alloc(htab->n_buckets *
 					   sizeof(struct bucket),
 					   htab->map.numa_node);
 	if (!htab->buckets)
-		goto free_charge;
+		goto free_htab;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < HASHTAB_MAP_LOCK_COUNT; i++) {
 		htab->map_locked[i] = __alloc_percpu_gfp(sizeof(int),
@@ -539,8 +524,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	for (i = 0; i < HASHTAB_MAP_LOCK_COUNT; i++)
 		free_percpu(htab->map_locked[i]);
 	bpf_map_area_free(htab->buckets);
-free_charge:
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&htab->map.memory);
 free_htab:
 	lockdep_unregister_key(&htab->lockdep_key);
 	kfree(htab);
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-19 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-19 17:37 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/34] mm: memcontrol/slab: use helpers to access slab page's memcg_data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/34] mm: introduce page memcg flags Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/34] mm: convert page kmemcg type to a page memcg flag Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-20  1:05   ` Song Liu
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-20  1:33   ` Song Liu
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-20  1:37   ` Song Liu
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-20  1:38   ` Song Liu
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-20  1:39   ` Song Liu
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-20  1:39   ` Song Liu
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-20  1:44   ` Song Liu
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-20  1:45   ` Song Liu
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-20  1:45   ` Song Liu
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-21  2:52   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-21  2:59     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-19 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
2020-11-23 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Daniel Borkmann
2020-11-24  0:05   ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201119173754.4125257-24-guro@fb.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).