linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cpupower tree
@ 2020-11-23  2:42 Stephen Rothwell
  2020-11-30 20:53 ` Shuah Khan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-11-23  2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Shuah Khan
  Cc: Borislav Petkov, Brahadambal Srinivasan,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, Shuah Khan

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4117 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:

  tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c

between commit:

  748f0d70087c ("cpupower: Provide online and offline CPU information")

from the cpupower tree and commit:

  8113ab20e850 ("tools/power/cpupower: Read energy_perf_bias from sysfs")

from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
index 2ead98169cf5,e8f8f643a627..000000000000
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
@@@ -1,12 -1,16 +1,17 @@@
  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
  
  #include <stdio.h>
+ #include <errno.h>
  #include <stdlib.h>
  
 +#include "helpers/helpers.h"
 +
  #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
  
 -#include "helpers/helpers.h"
+ #include "helpers/sysfs.h"
+ 
+ #include "cpupower_intern.h"
+ 
  #define MSR_AMD_HWCR	0xc0010015
  
  int cpufreq_has_boost_support(unsigned int cpu, int *support, int *active,
@@@ -44,64 -48,44 +49,104 @@@
  		*support = *active = 1;
  	return 0;
  }
+ 
+ int cpupower_intel_get_perf_bias(unsigned int cpu)
+ {
+ 	char linebuf[MAX_LINE_LEN];
+ 	char path[SYSFS_PATH_MAX];
+ 	unsigned long val;
+ 	char *endp;
+ 
+ 	if (!(cpupower_cpu_info.caps & CPUPOWER_CAP_PERF_BIAS))
+ 		return -1;
+ 
+ 	snprintf(path, sizeof(path), PATH_TO_CPU "cpu%u/power/energy_perf_bias", cpu);
+ 
+ 	if (cpupower_read_sysfs(path, linebuf, MAX_LINE_LEN) == 0)
+ 		return -1;
+ 
+ 	val = strtol(linebuf, &endp, 0);
+ 	if (endp == linebuf || errno == ERANGE)
+ 		return -1;
+ 
+ 	return val;
+ }
+ 
+ int cpupower_intel_set_perf_bias(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int val)
+ {
+ 	char path[SYSFS_PATH_MAX];
+ 	char linebuf[3] = {};
+ 
+ 	if (!(cpupower_cpu_info.caps & CPUPOWER_CAP_PERF_BIAS))
+ 		return -1;
+ 
+ 	snprintf(path, sizeof(path), PATH_TO_CPU "cpu%u/power/energy_perf_bias", cpu);
+ 	snprintf(linebuf, sizeof(linebuf), "%d", val);
+ 
+ 	if (cpupower_write_sysfs(path, linebuf, 3) <= 0)
+ 		return -1;
+ 
+ 	return 0;
+ }
+ 
  #endif /* #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) */
 +
 +/* get_cpustate
 + *
 + * Gather the information of all online CPUs into bitmask struct
 + */
 +void get_cpustate(void)
 +{
 +	unsigned int cpu = 0;
 +
 +	bitmask_clearall(online_cpus);
 +	bitmask_clearall(offline_cpus);
 +
 +	for (cpu = bitmask_first(cpus_chosen);
 +		cpu <= bitmask_last(cpus_chosen); cpu++) {
 +
 +		if (cpupower_is_cpu_online(cpu) == 1)
 +			bitmask_setbit(online_cpus, cpu);
 +		else
 +			bitmask_setbit(offline_cpus, cpu);
 +
 +		continue;
 +	}
 +}
 +
 +/* print_online_cpus
 + *
 + * Print the CPU numbers of all CPUs that are online currently
 + */
 +void print_online_cpus(void)
 +{
 +	int str_len = 0;
 +	char *online_cpus_str = NULL;
 +
 +	str_len = online_cpus->size * 5;
 +	online_cpus_str = (void *)malloc(sizeof(char) * str_len);
 +
 +	if (!bitmask_isallclear(online_cpus)) {
 +		bitmask_displaylist(online_cpus_str, str_len, online_cpus);
 +		printf(_("Following CPUs are online:\n%s\n"), online_cpus_str);
 +	}
 +}
 +
 +/* print_offline_cpus
 + *
 + * Print the CPU numbers of all CPUs that are offline currently
 + */
 +void print_offline_cpus(void)
 +{
 +	int str_len = 0;
 +	char *offline_cpus_str = NULL;
 +
 +	str_len = offline_cpus->size * 5;
 +	offline_cpus_str = (void *)malloc(sizeof(char) * str_len);
 +
 +	if (!bitmask_isallclear(offline_cpus)) {
 +		bitmask_displaylist(offline_cpus_str, str_len, offline_cpus);
 +		printf(_("Following CPUs are offline:\n%s\n"), offline_cpus_str);
 +		printf(_("cpupower set operation was not performed on them\n"));
 +	}
 +}

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cpupower tree
  2020-11-23  2:42 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cpupower tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2020-11-30 20:53 ` Shuah Khan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2020-11-30 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	Peter Zijlstra, Shuah Khan, Rafael J. Wysocki, Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Brahadambal Srinivasan, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List

On 11/22/20 7:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>    748f0d70087c ("cpupower: Provide online and offline CPU information")
> 
> from the cpupower tree and commit:
> 
>    8113ab20e850 ("tools/power/cpupower: Read energy_perf_bias from sysfs")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

Thanks. Fix looks good to me. I will mention it in my pull
request to Rafael.

thanks,
--Shuah

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-30 20:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-23  2:42 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cpupower tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30 20:53 ` Shuah Khan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).