From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C126EC6379D for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71460208D5 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="HSmbXCBR" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731140AbgK0QDv (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:03:51 -0500 Received: from hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:11674 "EHLO hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727904AbgK0QDu (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:03:50 -0500 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, AES256-SHA) id ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:03:57 -0800 Received: from HQMAIL109.nvidia.com (172.20.187.15) by HQMAIL101.nvidia.com (172.20.187.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:03:49 +0000 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.173) by HQMAIL109.nvidia.com (172.20.187.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:03:49 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=m2wBZd/5c+yRNALcknChB9vvDRMQDD9m8AGYxZ1DZjtHY7CgFI5sXHi3dpRoYlvls4HbPqBerqeu9NhSl0wiE8bR5YQqC3XG07Nhla/pszFXoBE5ehxJFYBUCxSM1hfr0sr0quJOIgU7g/vi6FZlij+ieodcz0f7dPy1mwGBx701ELubru46Y0xDQwW6CIFDN6wE6v8fpQQKqqaidQiOK4j7buz4um5XnlWLF8Ul/KZcbODsjq9WJGf6puLiA3wX3XVBP4bOP2NWugQR02nVIx+jb3LLPqKfG4N1vj1NYnpIbIqV2hX+yR/BxIBsN5E4Amk5corP6w9iAwHA/LYtSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=A/Jpyt7K6cI5XO45AbJhk7guOYgAR5OkJvIZ6evQXEU=; b=DKDqO5i4SC7b4fKoQxn9JNlqNHYVuCFKFjA/Hso0o2PyoZXDqPN3T2MOzCCuBW7oz9jPr85ECCle9jKbzHIQJonxHD282HqDBrbd4wUKVGgbYCwfK9cm719o4slfs54cfeIKxoRX9+vnk+/IOB+LfAtvNu88Cuopk6QV4cI1hi91NFxBOMXjJE+icsVuOZCbyol8rsVo7VE6NuJc+3dps4nK7oB+DC2De9VwpcYKzNAaY1e2uNiwMEP5Q0z92GeELioFg25dM2UUvgBC07TF2eI3XJyRu3YgofOM3HEu5FGmB+cc5pR6bWsMU2qf7YfwEwISgc17IlPTg9rq6Aaisw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nvidia.com; arc=none Received: from DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:14a::12) by DM6PR12MB3116.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:38::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3589.20; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:03:47 +0000 Received: from DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1ce9:3434:90fe:3433]) by DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1ce9:3434:90fe:3433%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3611.025; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:03:46 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:03:45 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Leon Romanovsky CC: Doug Ledford , Leon Romanovsky , Ariel Levkovich , Gal Pressman , Leon Romanovsky , , , Mark Zhang , Yishai Hadas Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v5 0/3] Track memory allocation with restrack DB help (Part II) Message-ID: <20201127160345.GA667848@nvidia.com> References: <20201117070148.1974114-1-leon@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201117070148.1974114-1-leon@kernel.org> X-ClientProxiedBy: MN2PR04CA0019.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:d4::32) To DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:14a::12) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from mlx.ziepe.ca (156.34.48.30) by MN2PR04CA0019.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:d4::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3611.20 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:03:46 +0000 Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kigDp-002nkT-8G; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:03:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1606493037; bh=A/Jpyt7K6cI5XO45AbJhk7guOYgAR5OkJvIZ6evQXEU=; h=ARC-Seal:ARC-Message-Signature:ARC-Authentication-Results:Date: From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:X-ClientProxiedBy:MIME-Version: X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType; b=HSmbXCBR6LwMu6LebsVTPJYbKIJJv2A80xshQrudrgPlOBLemgB/BEOYbDovGnzy7 SUxDI8vLqboEfn/nTxH0IWPdLj34xNZv2tipj/QPJQNZFy7vMmp/VlmNCLLhOt2oi5 Y5sjDOCU5p/dU6vv7vamlElY0YLHqrles8aVY+T7+EHuy8ZLT3uW5GRFT8z1uASc01 WXr/k3sDzJRtSfo9kGjxobb5s+xD8XZU8jtSIjrErcWaeKK8iL65Rpq23JZ+6tfCOb Yta0o0a6qxkLpnHaBRmM7nKVAetN8gjIPI3EOu/NGypRB8CPKkc0xiH4SA2+/zxqgD CQbINowf+pS7g== Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:01:45AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > From: Leon Romanovsky > > Changelog: > v5: > * Reorder patches to postpone changes in rdma_restrack_add to be in next series. > v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201104144008.3808124-1-leon@kernel.org/ > * Rebased on latest for-upstream, all that time the patches were in > our regression and didn't introduce any issues. > * Took first five patches that hadn't any comments > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200926101938.2964394-1-leon@kernel.org > * Rebased on already accepted patches. > * Added mlx4 special QPs to the list of not-tracked QPs (dropped previous mlx4 special QP patch). > * Separated to two patches change in return value of cma_listen_* routines. > * Changed commit messages and added Fixes as Jason requested. > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20200907122156.478360-1-leon@kernel.org/ > * Added new patch to fix mlx4 failure on SR-IOV, it didn't have port set. > * Changed "RDMA/cma: Delete from restrack DB after successful destroy" patch. > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200830101436.108487-1-leon@kernel.org > * Fixed rebase error, deleted second assignment of qp_type. > * Rebased code on latests rdma-next, the changes in cma.c caused to change > in patch "RDMA/cma: Delete from restrack DB after successful destroy". > * Dropped patch of port assignment, it is already done as part of this > series. > * I didn't add @calller description, regular users should not use _named() funciton. > v0: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824104415.1090901-1-leon@kernel.org > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Leon Romanovsky (3): > RDMA/core: Track device memory MRs > RDMA/core: Allow drivers to disable restrack DB > RDMA/restrack: Support all QP types Applied to for-next, thanks Jason