linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] irqtime: Move irqtime entry accounting after irq offset incrementation
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 12:23:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201201112338.GA72897@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201201092011.GS2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:20:11AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:12:25AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +static s64 irqtime_get_delta(struct irqtime *irqtime)
> >  {
> > +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >  	s64 delta;
> >  
> >  	delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - irqtime->irq_start_time;
> >  	irqtime->irq_start_time += delta;
> >  
> > +	return delta;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Called after incrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_enter */
> > +void irqtime_account_enter(struct task_struct *curr)
> > +{
> > +	struct irqtime *irqtime = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_irqtime);
> > +	u64 delta;
> > +
> > +	if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	delta = irqtime_get_delta(irqtime);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We do not account for softirq time from ksoftirqd here.
> > +	 * We want to continue accounting softirq time to ksoftirqd thread
> > +	 * in that case, so as not to confuse scheduler with a special task
> > +	 * that do not consume any time, but still wants to run.
> > +	 */
> > +	if ((irq_count() == (SOFTIRQ_OFFSET | HARDIRQ_OFFSET)) &&
> > +	    curr != this_cpu_ksoftirqd())
> > +		irqtime_account_delta(irqtime, delta, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Called before decrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_exit */
> > +void irqtime_account_exit(struct task_struct *curr)
> > +{
> > +	struct irqtime *irqtime = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_irqtime);
> > +	u64 delta;
> > +
> > +	if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	delta = irqtime_get_delta(irqtime);
> >  	/*
> >  	 * We do not account for softirq time from ksoftirqd here.
> >  	 * We want to continue accounting softirq time to ksoftirqd thread
> 
> 
> Urgh...
> 
> 
> Why not something like:
> 
> void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int offset)
> {
> 	struct irqtime *irqtime = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_irqtime);
> 	unsigned int pc = preempt_count() - offset;
> 	s64 delta;
> 	int cpu;
> 
> 	if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
> 		return;
> 
> 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> 	delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - irqtime->irq_start_time;
> 	irqtime->irq_start_time += delta;
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * We do not account for softirq time from ksoftirqd here.
> 	 * We want to continue accounting softirq time to ksoftirqd thread
> 	 * in that case, so as not to confuse scheduler with a special task
> 	 * that do not consume any time, but still wants to run.
> 	 */
> 	if (pc & HARDIRQ_MASK)
> 		irqtime_account_delta(irqtime, delta, CPUTIME_IRQ);
> 	else if ((pc & SOFTIRQ_OFFSET) && curr != this_cpu_ksoftirqd())
> 		irqtime_account_delta(irqtime, delta, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ);
> }
> 
> 

Right that's better, I'll do that.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-01 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-01  0:12 [PATCH 0/5] irq: Reorder time handling against HARDIRQ_OFFSET on IRQ entry v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01  0:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/cputime: Remove symbol exports from IRQ time accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01  0:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/vtime: Consolidate " Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01  0:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390/vtime: Convert to consolidated " Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01  0:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] irqtime: Move irqtime entry accounting after irq offset incrementation Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01  9:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 11:23     ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2020-12-01 11:33     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01 11:40       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01 13:34         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01 14:35           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01 15:01             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 15:53               ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01  0:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] irq: Call tick_irq_enter() inside HARDIRQ_OFFSET Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 11:57 [PATCH 0/5] irq: Reorder time handling against HARDIRQ_OFFSET on IRQ entry v3 Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 11:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] irqtime: Move irqtime entry accounting after irq offset incrementation Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 12:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-28  2:15   ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-29 13:41     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-29 14:12       ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-29 14:30         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-29 15:58           ` Qais Yousef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201201112338.GA72897@lothringen \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).