From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Cc: "linux@roeck-us.net" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"wim@linux-watchdog.org" <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
"mazziesaccount@gmail.com" <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-power <linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 2/4] mfd: Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:57:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201202125723.GK4801@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bd4abcb340bdf764fd23b685684d3f984319ed7.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> Hello Lee,
>
> On Fri, 2020-11-27 at 08:32 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> >
> > > Add core support for ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs which are
> > > mainly used to power the R-Car series processors.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 11 ++++
> > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c | 108
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h | 59 +++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 2 +
> > > 5 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c
> > > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h
> >
> > Looks like a possible candidate for "simple-mfd-i2c".
> >
> > Could you look into that please?
> >
> I must admit I didn't know about "simple-mfd-i2c". Good thing to know
> when working with simple devices :) Is this a new thing?
Yes, it's new.
> I am unsure I understand the idea fully. Should users put all the
> different regamp configs in this file and just add the device IDs with
> pointer to correct config? (BD9576 and BD9573 need volatile ranges).
> Also, does this mean each sub-device should have own node and own
> compatible in DT to get correctly load and probed? I guess this would
> need a buy-in from Rob too then.
You should describe the H/W in DT.
> By the way - for uneducated eyes like mine this does not look like it
> has much to do with MFD as a device - here MFD reminds me of a simple-
> bus on top of I2C.
This is for MFD devices where the parent does little more than create
a shared address space for child devices to operate on - like yours.
> Anyways, the BD9576 and BD9573 both have a few interrupts for OVD/UVD
> conditions and I am expecting that I will be asked to provide the
> regulator notifiers for those. Reason why I omitted the IRQs for now is
> that the HW is designed to keep the IRQ asserted for whole error
> duration so some delayed ack mechanism would be needed. I would like to
> keep the door open for adding IRQs to MFD core.
You mean to add an IRQ Domain?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 6:19 [PATCH RESEND v6 0/4] Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs Matti Vaittinen
2020-11-23 6:20 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 1/4] dt_bindings: mfd: Add " Matti Vaittinen
2020-11-23 6:20 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 2/4] mfd: Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF Matti Vaittinen
2020-11-27 8:32 ` Lee Jones
2020-11-27 9:44 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2020-12-02 12:57 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2020-12-02 13:32 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2020-12-17 10:04 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2020-12-29 8:43 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2021-01-14 10:00 ` Lee Jones
2021-01-14 10:57 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2020-12-02 14:26 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2020-11-23 6:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 3/4] wdt: Support wdt on " Matti Vaittinen
2020-11-23 6:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 4/4] MAINTAINERS: Add ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF drivers Matti Vaittinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201202125723.GK4801@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=Matti.Vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).