From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6D7C64E7B for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717AB20705 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728520AbgLBOD0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:03:26 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:40756 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727460AbgLBODY (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:03:24 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001D91063; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 06:02:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from C02TD0UTHF1T.local (unknown [10.57.23.201]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E27F83F718; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 06:02:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:02:33 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Alex Belits Cc: "trix@redhat.com" , Prasun Kapoor , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "mingo@kernel.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "rostedt@goodmis.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "peterx@redhat.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "nitesh@redhat.com" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "mtosatti@redhat.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "frederic@kernel.org" , "leon@sidebranch.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "pauld@redhat.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] "Task_isolation" mode Message-ID: <20201202140233.GB66958@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> References: <8d887e59ca713726f4fcb25a316e1e932b02823e.camel@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 05:40:49PM +0000, Alex Belits wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 08:36 -0800, Tom Rix wrote: > > External Email > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > > > On 11/23/20 9:42 AM, Alex Belits wrote: > > > This is an update of task isolation work that was originally done > > > by > > > Chris Metcalf and maintained by him until > > > November 2017. It is adapted to the current kernel and cleaned up > > > to > > > implement its functionality in a more complete and cleaner manner. > > > > I am having problems applying the patchset to today's linux-next. > > > > Which kernel should I be using ? > > The patches are against Linus' tree, in particular, commit > a349e4c659609fd20e4beea89e5c4a4038e33a95 Is there any reason to base on that commit in particular? Generally it's preferred that a series is based on a tag (so either a release or an -rc kernel), and that the cover letter explains what the base is. If you can do that in future it'll make the series much easier to work with. Thanks, Mark.