From: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org> To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kafai@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, andrii@kernel.org, kpsingh@chromium.org, revest@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] bpf: Test bpf_sk_storage_get in tcp iterators Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 21:55:27 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201202205527.984965-6-revest@google.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201202205527.984965-1-revest@google.com> This extends the existing bpf_sk_storage_get test where a socket is created and tagged with its creator's pid by a task_file iterator. A TCP iterator is now also used at the end of the test to negate the values already stored in the local storage. The test therefore expects -getpid() to be stored in the local storage. Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@google.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 13 +++++++++++++ .../progs/bpf_iter_bpf_sk_storage_helpers.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c index 9336d0f18331..b8362147c9e3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c @@ -978,6 +978,8 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void) /* This creates a socket and its local storage. It then runs a task_iter BPF * program that replaces the existing socket local storage with the tgid of the * only task owning a file descriptor to this socket, this process, prog_tests. + * It then runs a tcp socket iterator that negates the value in the existing + * socket local storage, the test verifies that the resulting value is -pid. */ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_get(void) { @@ -994,6 +996,10 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_get(void) if (CHECK(sock_fd < 0, "socket", "errno: %d\n", errno)) goto out; + err = listen(sock_fd, 1); + if (CHECK(err != 0, "listen", "errno: %d\n", errno)) + goto out; + map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.sk_stg_map); err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val, BPF_NOEXIST); @@ -1007,6 +1013,13 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_get(void) "map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n", getpid(), val, err); + do_dummy_read(skel->progs.negate_socket_local_storage); + + err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val); + CHECK(err || val != -getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem", + "map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n", + -getpid(), val, err); + close_socket: close(sock_fd); out: diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_sk_storage_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_sk_storage_helpers.c index dde53df37de8..6cecab2b32ba 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_sk_storage_helpers.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_sk_storage_helpers.c @@ -45,3 +45,21 @@ int fill_socket_owner(struct bpf_iter__task_file *ctx) return 0; } + +SEC("iter/tcp") +int negate_socket_local_storage(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx) +{ + struct sock_common *sk_common = ctx->sk_common; + int *sock_tgid; + + if (!sk_common) + return 0; + + sock_tgid = bpf_sk_storage_get(&sk_stg_map, sk_common, 0, 0); + if (!sock_tgid) + return 0; + + *sock_tgid = -*sock_tgid; + + return 0; +} -- 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 20:57 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-12-02 20:55 [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/6] net: Remove the err argument from sock_from_file Florent Revest 2020-12-02 20:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/6] bpf: Add a bpf_sock_from_file helper Florent Revest 2020-12-02 20:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/6] bpf: Expose bpf_sk_storage_* to iterator programs Florent Revest 2020-12-02 20:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/6] bpf: Add an iterator selftest for bpf_sk_storage_delete Florent Revest 2020-12-02 20:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/6] bpf: Add an iterator selftest for bpf_sk_storage_get Florent Revest 2020-12-04 1:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau 2020-12-02 20:55 ` Florent Revest [this message] 2020-12-04 2:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] bpf: Test bpf_sk_storage_get in tcp iterators Martin KaFai Lau 2020-12-04 11:37 ` Florent Revest
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201202205527.984965-6-revest@google.com \ --to=revest@chromium.org \ --cc=andrii@kernel.org \ --cc=ast@kernel.org \ --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=kafai@fb.com \ --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=revest@google.com \ --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \ --cc=yhs@fb.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] bpf: Test bpf_sk_storage_get in tcp iterators' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).