linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Ziljstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Linux-ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] sched/fair: Avoid revisiting CPUs multiple times during select_idle_sibling
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:20:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201203142011.GW3371@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201203141124.7391-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net>

Note: While this is done in the context of select_idle_core(), I would not
	expect it to be done like this. The intent is to illustrate how
	idle_cpu_mask could be filtered before select_idle_cpus() scans
	the rest of a domain or a wider scan was done across a cluster.

select_idle_core() potentially searches a number of CPUs for idle candidates
before select_idle_cpu() clears the mask and revisits the same CPUs. This
patch moves the initialisation of select_idle_mask to the top-level and
reuses the same mask across both select_idle_core and select_idle_cpu.
select_idle_smt() is left alone as the cost of checking one SMT sibling
is marginal relative to calling __clear_cpumask_cpu() for evey CPU
visited by select_idle_core().

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index cd95daf9f53e..af2e108c20c0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6096,10 +6096,9 @@ void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
  * sd_llc->shared->has_idle_cores and enabled through update_idle_core() above.
  */
 static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd,
-							int target, int nr)
+				int target, int nr, struct cpumask *cpus)
 {
 	int idle_candidate = -1;
-	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
 	int core, cpu;
 
 	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present))
@@ -6108,9 +6107,6 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd,
 	if (!test_idle_cores(target, false))
 		return -1;
 
-	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
-	__cpumask_clear_cpu(target, cpus);
-
 	for_each_cpu_wrap(core, cpus, target) {
 		bool idle = true;
 
@@ -6175,7 +6171,7 @@ static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
 
 static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd,
-							int target, int nr)
+					int target, int nr, struct cpumask *cpus)
 {
 	return -1;
 }
@@ -6193,14 +6189,10 @@ static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd
  * average idle time for this rq (as found in rq->avg_idle).
  */
 static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd,
-							int target, int nr)
+				int target, int nr, struct cpumask *cpus)
 {
-	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
 	int cpu;
 
-	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
-	__cpumask_clear_cpu(target, cpus);
-
 	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
 		schedstat_inc(this_rq()->sis_scanned);
 		if (!--nr)
@@ -6260,6 +6252,7 @@ static inline bool asym_fits_capacity(int task_util, int cpu)
 static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
 {
 	struct sched_domain *sd, *this_sd;
+	struct cpumask *cpus_visited;
 	unsigned long task_util;
 	int i, recent_used_cpu, depth;
 	u64 time;
@@ -6358,13 +6351,23 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
 
 	depth = sis_search_depth(sd, this_sd);
 
+	/*
+	 * Init the select_idle_mask. select_idle_core() will mask
+	 * out the CPUs that have already been limited to limit the
+	 * search in select_idle_cpu(). Further clearing is not
+	 * done as select_idle_smt checks only one CPU.
+	 */
+	cpus_visited = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
+	cpumask_and(cpus_visited, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
+	__cpumask_clear_cpu(target, cpus_visited);
+
 	schedstat_inc(this_rq()->sis_domain_search);
-	i = select_idle_core(p, sd, target, depth);
+	i = select_idle_core(p, sd, target, depth, cpus_visited);
 	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
 		return i;
 
 	time = cpu_clock(smp_processor_id());
-	i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd, target, depth);
+	i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd, target, depth, cpus_visited);
 	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
 		goto acct_cost;
 
-- 
2.26.2


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-03 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-03 14:11 [RFC PATCH 00/10] Reduce time complexity of select_idle_sibling Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] sched/fair: Track efficiency " Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 02/10] sched/fair: Track efficiency of task recent_used_cpu Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 03/10] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 04/10] sched/fair: Return an idle cpu if one is found after a failed search for an idle core Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 16:35   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-03 17:50     ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 05/10] sched/fair: Do not replace recent_used_cpu with the new target Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 06/10] sched/fair: Clear the target CPU from the cpumask of CPUs searched Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 16:38   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-03 17:52     ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-04 10:56       ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-04 11:30         ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-04 13:13           ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-04 13:17             ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-04 13:40               ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-04 13:47                 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-04 13:47                 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-04 14:07                   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-04 14:31                   ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-04 15:23                     ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-04 15:40                       ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-04 15:43                         ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-04 18:41                           ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-04 14:27               ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] sched/fair: Account for the idle cpu/smt search cost Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] sched/fair: Reintroduce SIS_AVG_CPU but in the context of SIS_PROP to reduce search depth Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] sched/fair: Limit the search for an idle core Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:19 ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-03 14:20 ` Mel Gorman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201203142011.GW3371@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).