From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7367C4361A for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F74207BD for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731552AbgLCSJY (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:09:24 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:59661 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730964AbgLCSJY (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:09:24 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 302CF67357; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 19:08:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 19:08:39 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , ira.weiny@intel.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J. Wong" , Dan Williams , Dave Chinner , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Jan Kara , Jeff Moyer , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: Fix _check_s_dax() Message-ID: <20201203180838.GA25196@lst.de> References: <20201202214145.1563433-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20201203081556.GA15306@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:55:50AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > *nod* and my suggestion was to explicitly test for the old/wrong value and > offer the test-runner a hint about why it may have been set (missing the > fix commit), but we should still ultimately fail the test when it is seen. Yes, that's what I'd prefer.