From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7F3C1B087 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E7E23444 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726866AbgLGN6i (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:58:38 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:49820 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726234AbgLGN6i (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:58:38 -0500 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8EF98057; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:57:53 +0200 From: Tony Lindgren To: Doug Anderson Cc: Andreas Kemnade , Ulf Hansson , Wolfram Sang , linux-omap , Linux ARM , LKML , Discussions about the Letux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: fix idling of devices during probe Message-ID: <20201207135753.GA26857@atomide.com> References: <20201204095539.31705-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20201204171428.0a011188@aktux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Doug Anderson [201204 16:43]: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:14 AM Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > > > > Fixes: 21b2cec61c04 ("mmc: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS for drivers that existed in v4.4") > > > > > > From the description it sounds like this problem has always existed > > > but the async probe just tickled it reliably. Seems like it'd make > > > sense to tag the "Fixes" as some earlier commit so you make sure your > > > fix gets picked to kernels even if they don't have the async probe > > > patch? > > > > > > > Hmm, maybe > > Fixes: 04abaf07f6d5 ("ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: Sync omap_device and > > pm_runtime after probe defer") > > > > But on the other hand to stable branches only such patches are applied > > which solve pratical problems not only theoretical problems. But maybe > > it solves several random issues where nobody took care to debug them. > > > > That would be since v4.11. > > I guess maybe best is to include both. Then if someone is debugging > why their async probe is failing they will notice this commit, but > they also might decide to pick it earlier just to be safe... OK I'll add the above fixes tag too and apply this into fixes. Thanks, Tony