From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2F3C4167B for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51249238E9 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728020AbgLGQf5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:35:57 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34898 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727673AbgLGQf4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:35:56 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:35:24 -0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1607358915; bh=MoKNkCCQLssCM2eQlwQkIPKZBt3fQJFl8EPNvdC6uz8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LzX+llb2fn88lHi72wD3wOBn1GRvHwKSBVF0h8wCPxlcREq03ioUhRoc6R31wRisM so0Wt1veq64ZOfktqabaafjDEj+QApOx3ebPTl+8W5YCi7pz8KgrXdfmICj9EMLCEY e8dXFr6zZqkoVpKKK50zON6vPgbbzaQfDvYcz41fY62QS428DIrmgY8kEsps7g+neI 6GU4LZGRaiMefDrRcpiqaTfcZ1YoNzqEW4dHtUdB4GH0HJCUrd1H13M5fhVWuvVGkE PRjejGcITeFn9BlVl/yIgdJeR1byvi4CIhSnnO/WAP833YO3BO9+WiwA29peV6KtPF V82GJKvjmuGqQ== From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ravi Bangoria Cc: Kajol Jain , jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com, rbernon@codeweavers.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Skip test 68 for Powerpc Message-ID: <20201207163524.GF125383@kernel.org> References: <20201104082954.57338-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> <20201119135022.36340-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> <4a2908ca-6b75-c688-ec3b-7f37783f08cc@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4a2908ca-6b75-c688-ec3b-7f37783f08cc@linux.ibm.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:04:53PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu: > > > On 11/19/20 7:20 PM, Kajol Jain wrote: > > Commit ed21d6d7c48e6e ("perf tests: Add test for PE binary format support") > > adds a WINDOWS EXE file named tests/pe-file.exe, which is > > examined by the test case 'PE file support'. As powerpc doesn't support > > it, we are skipping this test. > > > > Result in power9 platform before this patach: > > [command]# ./perf test -F 68 > > 68: PE file support : Failed! > > > > Result in power9 platform after this patch: > > [command]# ./perf test -F 68 > > 68: PE file support : Skip > > > > Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain > > Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria But why is it failing? I.e. what is that perf test -v -F 68 outputs? Using 'perf report' on a perf.data file containing samples in such binaries, collected on x86 should work on whatever workstation a developer uses. Say, on a MacBook aarch64 one can look at a perf.data file collected on a x86_64 system where Wine running a PE binary was present. - Arnaldo